28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 Chapter 2<br />

tribution of hot WDs derived by Fleming, Liebert, and Green (1986)—<br />

see Tab. 2.2. They calculated cooling sequences <strong>for</strong> M = 0.6 M ⊙ and<br />

0.8 M ⊙ with varying amounts of nonstandard cooling. The relative<br />

number of WDs in the two hot temperature bins of Tab. 2.2 are shown<br />

<strong>as</strong> a function of µ ν in Fig. 2.12.<br />

These results seem to indicate that a significantly enhanced rate of<br />

neutrino emission can be conservatively excluded. However, this view<br />

may be challenged if one includes the possibility of residual hydrogen<br />

burning near the WD surface which could m<strong>as</strong>k neutrino cooling<br />

because it would fill in some of the “neutrino dip” in the luminosity<br />

function. Because it is not known how much hydrogen is retained by<br />

a WD after the planetary nebula ph<strong>as</strong>e one h<strong>as</strong> an adjustable parameter<br />

to provide a desired amount of heating (C<strong>as</strong>tellani, Degl’Innocenti,<br />

and Romaniello 1994). However, preliminary investigations seem to indicate<br />

that even when residual hydrogen burning is included the impact<br />

of µ ν is m<strong>as</strong>ked only in one of the temperature bins used by Blinnikov<br />

and Dunina-Barkovskaya (1994) so that a significant de<strong>for</strong>mation of the<br />

luminosity function appears to remain (Blinnikov and Degl’Innocenti<br />

1995, private communication).<br />

2.2.4 Cooling by Boson Emission<br />

Standard or exotic neutrino emission from WDs (or neutron stars) h<strong>as</strong><br />

the important property that it switches off quickly <strong>as</strong> the star cools<br />

because of the steep temperature dependence of the emission rates.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, neutrinos cause a dip at the hot end of the luminosity function<br />

while older WDs are left unaffected, even <strong>for</strong> significantly enhanced<br />

neutrino cooling (Fig. 2.11). One may construct other c<strong>as</strong>es, however,<br />

where this is different. One example is when a putative low-m<strong>as</strong>s boson<br />

is emitted in place of a neutrino pair, say, in the bremsstrahlung<br />

process e + (Z, A) → (Z, A) + e + νν. The reduced final-state ph<strong>as</strong>e<br />

space then reduces the steepness of the temperature dependence of the<br />

energy-loss rate. The possible existence of such particles is motivated<br />

by theories involving spontaneously broken global symmetries. The<br />

most widely discussed example is the axion which will be studied in<br />

some detail in Chapter 14. For the present discussion all that matters<br />

is the temperature variation of an <strong>as</strong>sumed energy-loss rate.<br />

The bremsstrahlung rate <strong>for</strong> pseudoscalar bosons will be calculated<br />

in Chapter 3. For the highly degenerate limit the result is given in<br />

Eq. (3.33) where α ′ = g 2 /4π is the relevant “fine-structure constant.”<br />

Because this rate depends on the density only weakly through a factor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!