28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Preface<br />

xv<br />

Second, particles from distant sources may decay, and there may<br />

be photons or even me<strong>as</strong>urable neutrinos among the decay products.<br />

The absence of solar x- and γ-rays yields a limit on neutrino radiative<br />

decays which is <strong>as</strong> “safe” <strong>as</strong> a laboratory limit, yet nine orders<br />

of magnitude more restrictive. An even more restrictive limit obtains<br />

from the absence of γ-rays in conjunction with the SN 1987A neutrinos<br />

which allows one to conclude, <strong>for</strong> example, that even ν τ must obey<br />

the cosmological limit of m < ν ∼ 30 eV unless one invents new invisible<br />

decay channels.<br />

Third, the emission of weakly interacting particles causes a direct<br />

energy-loss channel from the interior of stars. For neutrinos, this effect<br />

h<strong>as</strong> been routinely included in stellar evolution calculations. If new lowm<strong>as</strong>s<br />

elementary particles were to exist such <strong>as</strong> axions or other Nambu-<br />

Goldstone bosons, or if neutrinos had novel interactions with the stellar<br />

medium such <strong>as</strong> one mediated by a putative neutrino magnetic dipole<br />

moment, then stars might lose energy too f<strong>as</strong>t. A comparison with the<br />

observed stellar properties allows one to derive restrictive limits on the<br />

operation of a new energy-loss or energy-transfer mechanism and thus<br />

to constrain the proposed novel particle interactions.<br />

While these and related arguments <strong>as</strong> well their application and results<br />

are extensively covered here, I have not written on several topics<br />

that might be expected to be represented in a book on the connection<br />

between particle physics and stars. Neutron stars have been speculated<br />

to consist of quark matter so that in principle they are a laboratory to<br />

study a quark-gluon pl<strong>as</strong>ma. As I am not familiar enough with the literature<br />

on this interesting topic I refer the reader to the review by Alcock<br />

and Olinto (1988) <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> to the more recent proceedings of two topical<br />

conferences (Madsen and Haensel 1992; V<strong>as</strong>siliadis et al. 1995).<br />

I have also dodged some important issues in the three-way relationship<br />

between cosmology, stars, and particle physics. If axions are not<br />

the dark matter of the universe, it is likely filled with a “background<br />

sea” of hypothetical weakly interacting m<strong>as</strong>sive particles (WIMPs) such<br />

<strong>as</strong> the lightest supersymmetric particles. Moreover, there may be exotic<br />

particles left over from the hot early universe such <strong>as</strong> magnetic<br />

monopoles which are predicted to exist in the framework of typical<br />

grand unified theories (GUTs). Some of the monopoles or WIMPs<br />

would be captured and accumulate in the interior of stars. GUT<br />

monopoles are predicted to catalyze nucleon decay (Rubakov-Callaneffect),<br />

providing stars with a novel energy source. This possibility can<br />

be constrained by analogous methods to those presented here which<br />

limit anomalous energy losses. The resulting constraints on the pres-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!