28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nonstandard Neutrinos 269<br />

dipole moment <strong>for</strong> F 2 , and an electric dipole moment <strong>for</strong> G 2 . In the<br />

matrix element derived from this Lagrangian these couplings should<br />

be viewed <strong>as</strong> <strong>for</strong>m factors which are functions of Q 2 where Q is the<br />

energy-momentum transfer to the fermion, i.e. the energy momentum<br />

of the photon line attached to the fermion current. The interpretation<br />

of a charge etc. then pertains to the Q 2 → 0 limit.<br />

It is usually <strong>as</strong>sumed that neutrinos are electrically neutral, i.e. that<br />

F 1 (0) = 0 because electric charge quantization implies that elementary<br />

particles carry only charges in multiples of 1 e where e is the electron<br />

3<br />

charge. In recent discussions of electric charge quantization 43 it w<strong>as</strong><br />

stressed, however, that the standard model of electroweak interactions<br />

without grand unification requirements does allow neutrinos to carry<br />

small electric charges. Their possible magnitude is thus an experimental<br />

issue; existing limits are reviewed in Sect. 15.8. Because these limits<br />

are very restrictive, i.e. because neutrino electric charges must be very<br />

small, it appears likely that electric charge is quantized after all so that<br />

neutrino electric charges vanish identically.<br />

Even if neutrinos are electrically neutral, <strong>as</strong> shall be <strong>as</strong>sumed hence<strong>for</strong>th,<br />

they can virtually dissociate into charged particles and so they<br />

will have a <strong>for</strong>m factor F 1 (Q 2 ) which does not vanish <strong>for</strong> Q 2 ≠ 0. One<br />

may visualize the neutral object <strong>as</strong> a superposition of two charge distributions<br />

of opposite sign with different spatial extensions. In terms<br />

of a power series expansion of F 1 (Q 2 ) one usually defines the charge<br />

radius by virtue of<br />

⟨r 2 ⟩ = 6 ∂F 1(Q 2 )<br />

e ∂Q 2 ∣ ∣∣∣∣Q 2 =0<br />

(7.20)<br />

where ⟨r 2 ⟩ may be both positive or negative.<br />

For neutrinos, the interpretation of the charge radius <strong>as</strong> an observable<br />

quantity is a rather subtle issue <strong>as</strong> it is probed by “off-shell”<br />

photons (Q 2 ≠ 0), i.e. by intermediate photons in processes such <strong>as</strong><br />

scattering by photon exchange. Because the <strong>for</strong>m factor is proportional<br />

to Q 2 such scattering processes do not exhibit a Coulomb divergence.<br />

The charge radius induces a short-range or contact interaction similar<br />

to processes involving Z ◦ exchange. There<strong>for</strong>e, the charge radius<br />

represents a correction to the standard tree-level electroweak scattering<br />

amplitude between neutrinos and charged particles. This tree-level<br />

43 Babu and Mohapatra 1990; Babu and Volk<strong>as</strong> 1992; Tak<strong>as</strong>ugi and Tanaka 1992;<br />

Foot, Lew, and Volk<strong>as</strong> 1993; Foot 1994. References to earlier works are given in<br />

these papers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!