28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

534 Chapter 14<br />

14.3 Fine Points of Axion Properties<br />

14.3.1 The Most Common Axion Models<br />

Axions generically mix with pions so that their m<strong>as</strong>s and their couplings<br />

to photons and nucleons are crudely f π /f a times those of π ◦ . In detail,<br />

however, these properties depend on the specific implementation of<br />

the PQ mechanism. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is useful to review briefly the most<br />

common axion models which may serve <strong>as</strong> generic examples <strong>for</strong> an<br />

interpretation of the <strong>as</strong>trophysical evidence.<br />

In the standard model, the would-be Nambu-Goldstone boson from<br />

the spontaneous breakdown of SU(2)×U(1) is interpreted <strong>as</strong> the third<br />

component of the neutral gauge boson Z ◦ , making it impossible <strong>for</strong> the<br />

scalar field Φ of which axions are the ph<strong>as</strong>e to be the standard Higgs<br />

field. There<strong>for</strong>e, one needs to introduce two independent Higgs fields Φ 1<br />

and Φ 2 with vacuum expectation values f 1 / √ 2 and f 2 / √ 2 which must<br />

obey (f 2 1 + f 2 2 ) 1/2 = f weak ≡ ( √ 2 G F ) −1/2 ≈ 250 GeV. In this standard<br />

axion model (Peccei and Quinn 1977a,b; Weinberg 1978; Wilczek 1978)<br />

Φ 1 gives m<strong>as</strong>ses to the up- and Φ 2 to the down-quarks and charged<br />

leptons. With x ≡ f 1 /f 2 and 3 families the axion decay constant is<br />

f a = f weak [3 (x + 1/x)] −1 ∼ < 42 GeV. This and related “variant” models<br />

(Peccei, Wu, and Yanagida 1986; Krauss and Wilczek 1986), however,<br />

are ruled out by overwhelming experimental and <strong>as</strong>trophysical evidence;<br />

<strong>for</strong> reviews see Kim (1987), Cheng (1988), and Peccei (1989).<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, one is led to introduce an electroweak singlet Higgs field<br />

with a vacuum expectation value f PQ / √ 2 which is not related to the<br />

weak scale. Taking f PQ ≫ f weak , the m<strong>as</strong>s of the axion becomes<br />

very small, its interactions very weak. Such models are generically referred<br />

to <strong>as</strong> invisible axion models. The first of its kind w<strong>as</strong> the KSVZ<br />

model (Kim 1979; Shifman, Vainshtein, and Zakharov 1980) discussed<br />

in Sect. 14.2.2. It is very simple because the PQ mechanism entirely<br />

decouples from the ordinary particles: at low energies, axions interact<br />

with matter and radiation only by virtue of their two-gluon coupling<br />

which is generic <strong>for</strong> the PQ scheme. The KSVZ model in its simplest<br />

<strong>for</strong>m is determined by only one free parameter, f a = f PQ , although one<br />

may introduce N > 1 exotic quarks whence f a = f PQ /N.<br />

Also widely discussed is the DFSZ model introduced by Zhitnitskiĭ<br />

(1980) and by Dine, Fischler, and Srednicki (1981). It is a hybrid between<br />

the standard and KSVZ models in that it uses an electroweak<br />

singlet scalar field Φ with a vacuum expectation value f PQ / √ 2 and two<br />

electroweak doublet fields Φ 1 and Φ 2 . There is no need, however, <strong>for</strong> ex-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!