28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What Have We Learned from SN 1987A 495<br />

scattering on cosmic background neutrinos <strong>as</strong> an example. The presentday<br />

density of primordial neutrinos is about 100 cm −3 in each neutrino<br />

and antineutrino flavor. With a distance to the Large Magellanic<br />

Cloud of about 50 kpc = 1.5×10 23 cm one h<strong>as</strong> a column density between<br />

SN 1987A and Earth of about 10 25 cm −2 so that the ν e -ν cross<br />

section must be less than about 10 −25 cm 2 . If the cosmic background<br />

neutrinos are m<strong>as</strong>sless they have a temperature of about 1.8 K and<br />

so ⟨E ν ⟩ ≈ 3T ν ≈ 5×10 −4 eV. Because the me<strong>as</strong>ured SN neutrinos<br />

have<br />

√<br />

a characteristic energy of 30 MeV the center of m<strong>as</strong>s energy is<br />

s ≈ 200 eV.<br />

The cross-section bound is not particularly impressive compared<br />

with a standard weak cross section of order G 2 Fs ≈ 10 −51 cm 2 . However,<br />

νν cross sections have never been directly me<strong>as</strong>ured and so the<br />

SN 1987A limit provides nontrivial in<strong>for</strong>mation. As an example, neutrinos<br />

could scatter by majoron exchange, or they could scatter directly<br />

on a background of primordial majorons. Kolb and Turner then<br />

found a certain constraint on the neutrino-majoron Yukawa coupling<br />

(Sect. 15.7.2). As another example, the proposition that the solar neutrino<br />

flux could be substantially depleted by scatterings on cosmic background<br />

particles (Slad’ 1983) is excluded.<br />

Other particles besides neutrinos may have been emitted from the<br />

SN and could have caused detectable events. Engel, Seckel, and Hayes<br />

(1990) have discussed the c<strong>as</strong>e of axions; they can be absorbed in water<br />

by oxygen nuclei, a 16 O → 16 O ∗ , which subsequently produce γ rays by<br />

decays of the sort 16 O ∗ → 16 O γ, 16 O ∗ → 15 O n γ, and 16 O ∗ → 15 N p γ.<br />

The γ rays would cause electromagnetic c<strong>as</strong>cades and so they are detectable<br />

about <strong>as</strong> efficiently <strong>as</strong> e ± . The axion emission w<strong>as</strong> estimated by<br />

identifying their unit optical depth <strong>for</strong> a given interaction strength in a<br />

simplified model of the SN temperature and density profile. More than<br />

10 extra events would be expected at Kamiokande <strong>for</strong> an axion-nucleon<br />

Yukawa coupling in the range<br />

1×10 −6 ∼ < g aN ∼ < 1×10 −3 (13.2)<br />

which is thus excluded. In the middle of this interval, up to 300 additional<br />

events would have been expected. However, axions with couplings<br />

in this interval are also excluded by other methods (Sect. 14.4).<br />

13.2.2 Energy Distribution<br />

The energy distribution of the events at the IMB and Kamiokande<br />

detectors broadly confirms the expected qu<strong>as</strong>i-thermal emission with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!