28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

560 Chapter 15<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses by a see-saw type mixing effect with the heavy states. The majoron<br />

coupling to standard neutrinos would be extremely small in this<br />

model, leading to no interesting consequences besides small Majorana<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses <strong>for</strong> ν e , ν µ , and ν τ .<br />

Gelmini and Roncadelli (1981) and Georgi, Gl<strong>as</strong>how, and Nussinov<br />

(1981) suggested instead to do away with the unobserved heavy sterile<br />

neutrinos and give a small Majorana m<strong>as</strong>s directly to the sequential<br />

neutrinos by the interaction with the new Higgs field. The intriguing<br />

feature of this model is that it requires a very small vacuum expectation<br />

value v, perhaps in the keV regime. As all couplings of the new Higgs<br />

field to fermions scale with the inverse of v, the majoron would have<br />

a rather strong coupling to neutrinos. Among many f<strong>as</strong>cinating phenomenological<br />

and <strong>as</strong>trophysical consequences (e.g. Georgi, Gl<strong>as</strong>how,<br />

and Nussinov 1981; Gelmini, Nussinov, and Roncadelli 1982) this model<br />

predicted, however, that the new Higgs field should contribute precisely<br />

the equivalent of two m<strong>as</strong>sless neutrino species to the Z ◦ decay width.<br />

The me<strong>as</strong>urements of this width at CERN and SLAC in 1989−1990,<br />

however, correspond exactly to the known three neutrino flavors (Particle<br />

Data <strong>Group</strong> 1994), leaving no room <strong>for</strong> this “triplet majoron model.”<br />

Other “doublet majoron models” which would contribute one-half of an<br />

effective neutrino species to the Z ◦ decay width are also excluded (<strong>for</strong><br />

references see, e.g. Berezhiani, Smirnov, and Valle 1992). It is possible,<br />

however, to construct majoron models <strong>for</strong> Majorana neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses<br />

which retain the original idea of Chic<strong>as</strong>hige, Mohapatra, and Peccei<br />

(1981) and yet provide large majoron-neutrino couplings (e.g. Berezhiani,<br />

Smirnov, and Valle 1992 and references therein; see also Burgess<br />

and Cline 1994a; Kikuchi and Ma 1994, 1995).<br />

The main motivation <strong>for</strong> going out of one’s way to construct such<br />

models does not arise from particle theory but rather from experiments<br />

and <strong>as</strong>trophysics. In Sect. 7.1.4 it w<strong>as</strong> outlined that those nuclei<br />

which decay predominantly by a double beta channel (emission of 2e −<br />

and 2ν e ) can also decay in a neutrinoless mode if ν e h<strong>as</strong> a Majorana<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s, allowing an emitted ν e to be effectively reabsorbed <strong>as</strong> a ν e . In<br />

majoron models of Majorana neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses there is a third decay<br />

channel where the intermediate ν e in the 0ν mode radiates a majoron<br />

so that effectively 2e − plus one majoron χ are emitted. The expected<br />

sum spectrum of the electron energies would be continuous <strong>as</strong> in the<br />

2ν mode, but with a different spectral shape. Once in a while, experiments<br />

which search <strong>for</strong> the 0ν mode (a sharp endpoint peak of<br />

the 2e − sum spectrum) have reported a continuous spectral signature<br />

which allegedly could not be <strong>as</strong>cribed to the dominant 2ν mode or other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!