28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Solar Neutrinos 381<br />

deficits in all detectors may give us the first indication <strong>for</strong> neutrino<br />

oscillations and thus <strong>for</strong> nonvanishing neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses and mixings.<br />

Because of the statistically high significance of the anticorrelations<br />

with solar activity of the Homestake results it is not entirely obvious<br />

how to proceed with a quantitative test of the oscillation hypothesis<br />

which can cause only a day-night or semiannual time variation. In the<br />

present section a possible long-term variability of the solar neutrino<br />

flux or its detection methods is ignored, i.e. the apparent anticorrelation<br />

with solar activity at Homestake is considered to be a statistical<br />

fluctuation. In Sect. 10.7 a possible explanation in terms of neutrino<br />

interactions with the solar magnetic field is considered.<br />

One may take the opposite point of view that the variability at<br />

Homestake is a real effect, and that it is not related to neutrino magnetic<br />

moments because that hypothesis requires fairly extreme values<br />

<strong>for</strong> the dipole moments and solar magnetic fields (Sect. 10.7). An interpretation<br />

of the data in terms of neutrino oscillations then becomes<br />

difficult because one admits from the start that unknown physical effects<br />

are either operating in the Sun, in the intervening space, or in<br />

the detectors. One could argue perhaps that the apparent variability<br />

of the Homestake data in itself w<strong>as</strong> evidence that something w<strong>as</strong> wrong<br />

with this experiment. In this c<strong>as</strong>e one could still test the hypothesis<br />

of neutrino oscillations under the <strong>as</strong>sumption that the signal recorded<br />

at Homestake w<strong>as</strong> spurious in which c<strong>as</strong>e one must discard the entire<br />

data set, not only parts of it <strong>as</strong> h<strong>as</strong> sometimes been done. Ignoring<br />

the Homestake data does not solve the solar neutrino problem, but its<br />

significance is reduced.<br />

Still, <strong>as</strong> no one h<strong>as</strong> put <strong>for</strong>th a plausible hypothesis <strong>for</strong> a specific<br />

problem with the Homestake experiment it is arbitrary to discard the<br />

data. Admittedly, it is also arbitrary to consider the time variation<br />

spurious even though standard statistical methods seem to reveal a<br />

highly significant anticorrelation with solar activity.<br />

10.6.2 Vacuum Oscillations<br />

A <strong>for</strong>mal treatment of vacuum neutrino oscillations w<strong>as</strong> presented in<br />

Sect. 8.3. If the observer is many oscillation lengths away from the<br />

source, and if the neutrinos are produced with a broad spectrum of energies<br />

from an extended source, one will observe an incoherent mixture<br />

of the m<strong>as</strong>s eigenstates. If one considers two-flavor oscillations ν e ↔ ν a<br />

with ν a = ν µ , ν τ , or some hypothetical sterile flavor, the ν e flux is reduced<br />

by a factor 1 − 1 2 sin2 2θ (vacuum mixing angle θ). There<strong>for</strong>e,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!