28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

586 Appendix C<br />

Fig. C.1. Regions of density and temperature where the indicated neutrino<br />

emission processes contribute more than 90% of the total. µ e is the electron<br />

“mean molecular weight,” i.e. roughly the number of baryons per electron.<br />

The bremsstrahlung contribution depends on the chemical composition. The<br />

solid lines are <strong>for</strong> helium, the dotted ones <strong>for</strong> iron which yields a larger<br />

bremsstrahlung rate.<br />

A detailed comparison of these <strong>for</strong>mulae with the exact rates w<strong>as</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>med by Haft, Raffelt, and Weiss (1994). They provided a new<br />

fitting <strong>for</strong>mula which approximates the analytic emission rate to within<br />

5% in the entire regime where the pl<strong>as</strong>ma process dominates.<br />

C.2 Photoneutrino and Pair-Annihilation<br />

Process<br />

Beaudet, Petrosian, and Salpeter (1967) provided analytic approximations<br />

<strong>for</strong> the photoneutrino and pair-annihilation processes. Dicus<br />

(1972) gave global correction factors to these rates to include neutralcurrent<br />

effects. Schinder et al. (1987) numerically recalculated the emission<br />

rates in the standard model and found good agreement with the<br />

BPS <strong>for</strong>mulae together with the Dicus correction factors. They supplemented<br />

the BPS rates <strong>for</strong> the temperature range 10 10 −10 11 K.<br />

An alternate set of approximation <strong>for</strong>mulae w<strong>as</strong> provided by Itoh<br />

et al. (1989) who improved on their previous work (Munakata, Kohyama,<br />

and Itoh 1985). In Fig. C.2 I show the relative deviation between<br />

the Itoh et al. (1989) with the Schinder et al. (1987) rates. The total

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!