28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Radiative Particle Decays 483<br />

12.4.9 Axions<br />

Another hypothetical particle that could have been emitted abundantly<br />

from SN 1987A is the axion. The impact of the axionic energy loss is<br />

discussed in Sect. 13.5. If axions are more strongly interacting than a<br />

certain limit, implying that their m<strong>as</strong>s is larger than a few eV, they<br />

are emitted from the surface of the SN core with a luminosity similar<br />

to that of neutrinos. Kolb and Turner (1989) found that the axion<br />

fluence from SN 1987A would have been F a ≈ 6×10 10 cm −2 m −12/11<br />

eV<br />

with m eV ≡ m a /eV at a temperature of T a ≈ 15 MeV m −4/11<br />

eV . From<br />

the GRS fluence limits, Kolb and Turner found that m a must be less<br />

than a few 10 eV, a bound which is less restrictive than, <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

the limit from globular cluster stars (Sect. 5.2.5).<br />

12.4.10 Supernova Energetics<br />

To derive the various GRS limits one had to <strong>as</strong>sume that the radiative<br />

decays occurred outside of the progenitor’s envelope and so neutrinos<br />

falling into the shaded area in Fig. 12.16 were not accessible to these<br />

arguments. However, in this c<strong>as</strong>e the stellar envelope itself serves <strong>as</strong> a<br />

“detector” <strong>as</strong> discussed by Falk and Schramm (1978) many years ago;<br />

see also Takahara and Sato (1986). Supernova observations in general,<br />

and those of SN 1987A in particular, indicate that of the approximately<br />

3×10 53 erg of rele<strong>as</strong>ed gravitational binding energy only a small fraction<br />

on the order of one percent becomes directly visible in the <strong>for</strong>m of the<br />

optical explosion <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the kinetic energy of the ejecta. In contr<strong>as</strong>t,<br />

even if only one of the neutrino species decayed radiatively within the<br />

progenitor, about 30% of the binding energy would light up!<br />

If the lifetime were so short that the parent neutrinos would never<br />

get far from the SN core one would not have to worry. There<strong>for</strong>e, the<br />

critical range of decay times is between the core dimensions of about<br />

30 km = 10 −4 s and the envelope radius of about 100 s. If the neutrinos<br />

had nonradiative decay modes, and if their total laboratory lifetime fell<br />

into this range, one could only conclude that B < γ ∼ 10 −2 .<br />

If they decayed only into radiation, and taking E ν to be 10 MeV,<br />

the quantity τ γ /m ν cannot lie between about 10 −11 and 10 −5 s/eV (<strong>for</strong><br />

heavy neutrinos τ γ includes the e + e − channel). For an effective transition<br />

moment µ eff , an interval between about 10 2 and 10 5 µ B m −2<br />

eV is<br />

excluded, moderately interesting only <strong>for</strong> large m<strong>as</strong>ses. Then, however,<br />

the cosmological limits strongly suggest the presence of nonradiative<br />

decay channels.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!