28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

432 Chapter 11<br />

11.4.2 Prompt ν e Burst<br />

The prompt ν e burst from a core collapse SN can be detected, in principle,<br />

by the <strong>for</strong>ward-peaked signal from the el<strong>as</strong>tic ν e e → eν e scattering<br />

in a water Cherenkov detector. In the Kamiokande SN 1987A observations,<br />

the first event could have been caused by the prompt ν e burst,<br />

but naturally one event contains no statistically significant in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

It could have been caused by ν e p → ne + and simply happen to point<br />

in the <strong>for</strong>ward direction. There<strong>for</strong>e, the main interest in the prompt ν e<br />

burst is the possibility that it could be observed from a future galactic<br />

SN by the Superkamiokande or SNO detectors which would yield statistically<br />

significant signatures. A possible oscillation of the ν e burst<br />

into other flavors would reduce the number of <strong>for</strong>ward events because<br />

of the reduced ν-e scattering cross section of non-ν e flavors (Fig. 11.10).<br />

If the neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s hierarchy is normal where the lightest m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

eigenstate is the dominant ν e admixture, the medium-induced neutrino<br />

refractive index in the stellar mantle and envelope can cause a “m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

inversion” and thus level crossing between, say, ν e and ν µ in analogy<br />

to the solar MSW effect. There<strong>for</strong>e, one may expect resonant flavor<br />

conversion of the prompt ν e burst in a collapsing star <strong>as</strong> shown by a<br />

number of authors; 67 I follow the analysis of Nötzold (1987).<br />

When the shock wave breaks through the neutrino sphere and liberates<br />

the prompt ν e burst, the overlaying part of the progenitor star<br />

h<strong>as</strong> not yet noticed the collapse of its core so that the density profile is<br />

given by that of the progenitor star. The electron density is re<strong>as</strong>onably<br />

well approximated by a simple power law <strong>for</strong> which Nötzold (1987) used<br />

n e ≈ 10 34 cm −3 r −3<br />

7 , (11.11)<br />

where r 7 ≡ r/10 7 cm. Note that 10 7 cm = 100 km is the approximate<br />

radius of the shell from where the ν e ’s originate. According to the<br />

discussion in Sect. 6.7.1 the electron density causes an energy shift<br />

between ν e and ν µ or ν τ of ∆V = √ 2G F n e = 1.3×10 −3 eV r7 −3 . Comparing<br />

this with the energy shift ∆m 2 ν/2p ν of neutrinos with momentum<br />

p ν one finds an effective medium-induced effect of ∆m 2 eff = 2p ν ∆V =<br />

3×10 4 eV 2 p 10 r7 −3 where p 10 = p ν /10 MeV.<br />

However, because the prompt ν e burst itself constitutes a large local<br />

ν e density, the neutrino-induced refractive index may be more important<br />

than the standard electron-induced contribution. The total num-<br />

67 Mikheev and Smirnov (1986), Arafune et al. (1987a,b), Lagage et al. (1987),<br />

Minakata et al. (1987), Nötzold (1987), Walker and Schramm (1987), Kuo and<br />

Pantaleone (1988), Minakata and Nunokawa (1988), and Rosen (1988).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!