28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Miscellaneous Exotica 559<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s, and in supernovae. Another motivation to consider majoron<br />

models is the possibility to account <strong>for</strong> f<strong>as</strong>t neutrino decays in order to<br />

avoid cosmological neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s bounds. In the laboratory, majorons<br />

could show up in experiments searching <strong>for</strong> neutrinoless 2β decays.<br />

The main motivation <strong>for</strong> the introduction of majorons is the puzzling<br />

smallness of neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses (if they have nonvanishing m<strong>as</strong>ses at<br />

all) relative to other fermions. As outlined in Sect. 7.1, in the particlephysics<br />

standard model it is thought that all Dirac fermions acquire a<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s by their interaction with a background Higgs field which takes on<br />

a cl<strong>as</strong>sical value (vacuum expectation value) Φ 0 everywhere; neutrino<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses could well arise in the same f<strong>as</strong>hion, except that the Yukawa<br />

couplings to the Higgs field would have to be extremely small. Alternatively,<br />

one may speculate that neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses are so small because<br />

they arise in a different f<strong>as</strong>hion. Notably, the known sequential neutrinos<br />

ν e , ν µ , and ν τ could well be Majorana fermions, i.e. their own<br />

antiparticles so that the ν e is really equivalent to a helicity-plus ν e . As<br />

long <strong>as</strong> neutrinos are m<strong>as</strong>sless this picture is equivalent to an interpretation<br />

where the standard left-handed neutrinos are the two active<br />

components of a four-component Dirac spinor while the two remaining<br />

sterile components would never have been observed because they<br />

do not interact. With a nonvanishing m<strong>as</strong>s these interpretations are<br />

v<strong>as</strong>tly different because helicity flips in collisions would allow one to<br />

produce the (almost) sterile “wrong-helicity” Dirac components. This<br />

possibility w<strong>as</strong> exploited in Sect. 13.8.1 to set bounds on a neutrino<br />

Dirac m<strong>as</strong>s from the SN 187A neutrino signal. For Majorana neutrinos,<br />

a helicity-flipping collision takes an active ν e into an active ν e ,<br />

thus violating lepton number by two units. There<strong>for</strong>e, Majorana m<strong>as</strong>ses<br />

could not arise from the coupling to the standard Higgs field which is<br />

lepton-number conserving.<br />

Majorana m<strong>as</strong>ses could arise, however, by interacting with a different<br />

Higgs field which would develop a vacuum expectation value by<br />

virtue of the usual spontaneous breakdown of a global symmetry. The<br />

resulting Nambu-Goldstone boson is the majoron. (Recall that the<br />

Nambu-Goldstone boson of the standard Higgs field shows up <strong>as</strong> the<br />

third polarization degree of the m<strong>as</strong>sive Z ◦ gauge boson so that there<br />

is no m<strong>as</strong>sless Nambu-Goldstone degree of freedom in the standard<br />

model.) In the original model of Chic<strong>as</strong>hige, Mohapatra, and Peccei<br />

(1981), the “singlet majoron model,” the new vacuum expectation value<br />

w<strong>as</strong> considered to be much larger than the standard Φ 0 ≈ 250 GeV.<br />

Large m<strong>as</strong>ses would be given primarily to sterile neutrinos postulated<br />

to exist; the standard sequential neutrinos would obtain their small

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!