28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

488 Chapter 12<br />

on the Hubble type, varying from 0.2 h 2 SNu <strong>for</strong> Sa spirals to about<br />

5 h 2 SNu <strong>for</strong> Sd (van den Bergh and Tammann 1991) where the supernova<br />

unit is defined by 1 SNu ≡ 1 SN per century per 10 10 L ⊙,B .<br />

Adopting 1 h 2 SNu <strong>as</strong> a representative value and about 5×10 57 neutrinos<br />

plus antineutrinos of a given flavor per SN yields <strong>for</strong> each flavor<br />

Ṅ ν ≈ h 3 1.3×10 −27 cm −3 s −1 , a rate almost identical to that from<br />

hydrogen-burning stars. 79 The radiative lifetime limit is then also identical,<br />

except that it applies to neutrinos of all flavors.<br />

All of these bounds are weaker than those from SN 1987A. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

decaying stellar neutrinos cannot actually contribute to the observed<br />

x- and γ-ray background.<br />

12.7 Cosmological Bounds<br />

12.7.1 Neutrinos<br />

Within the big-bang scenario a cosmic background sea of neutrinos is<br />

an inevitable consequence of the hot early universe. Its contribution to<br />

the cosmic energy density w<strong>as</strong> already used in Sect. 7.1.5 to derive extremely<br />

restrictive neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s limits. If neutrinos decay radiatively,<br />

further constraints can be obtained. For one, the decay photons can<br />

show up directly <strong>as</strong> a diffuse, isotropic cosmic background radiation.<br />

If the decays occur be<strong>for</strong>e recombination, i.e. be<strong>for</strong>e the universe became<br />

transparent to radiation, but so late that the photons could not<br />

be thermalized entirely, they contribute to a spectral distortion of the<br />

cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). The resulting limits<br />

were discussed, <strong>for</strong> example, by Kolb and Turner (1990) who found<br />

that those are<strong>as</strong> of m<strong>as</strong>ses and lifetimes are excluded that are hatched<br />

in Fig. 12.20. It w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that neutrinos decay only radiatively.<br />

The contribution of the neutrinos and their decay products to the<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s density of the universe leads to the constraints shown in Fig. 7.2<br />

which are b<strong>as</strong>ed on the present-day value of Ωh 2 and on the expansion<br />

79 Multiplying this rate with the age of the universe of about 3×10 17 s and the<br />

speed of light of 3×10 10 cm/s, and using h = 0.5 one finds an estimated present-day<br />

flux at Earth of about 1 cm −2 s −1 . In a recent detailed study, Totani and Sato<br />

(1995) find a flux which is larger than this crude estimate by <strong>as</strong> much <strong>as</strong> a factor<br />

of 30. The Kamiokande II detector h<strong>as</strong> set an upper limit on the cosmic background<br />

flux of ν e of about 10 3 cm −2 s −1 <strong>for</strong> effective temperatures in the 3−4 MeV range<br />

(Zhang et al. 1988). It is conceivable that this background will be me<strong>as</strong>ured by<br />

the Superkamiokande detector. Note that at the Kamiokande site the ν e flux from<br />

power reactors is roughly 1000 times larger than the background flux, except that<br />

it falls off sharply beyond about 10 MeV.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!