28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Neutrino Oscillations 299<br />

If the neutrino crosses a density region such that a resonance occurs,<br />

this part of the trajectory yields the most restrictive adiabaticity<br />

requirement. On resonance ξ = cos 2θ 0 and sin 2θ = 1. In this c<strong>as</strong>e one<br />

defines an adiabaticity parameter<br />

γ ≡ m2 2 − m 2 1<br />

2ω<br />

sin 2θ 0 tan 2θ 0<br />

|∇ ln n e | res<br />

, (8.39)<br />

where the denominator is to be evaluated at the resonance point. The<br />

adiabatic condition is γ ≫ 1. It establishes a relationship between vacuum<br />

mixing angles and neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses <strong>for</strong> which resonant oscillations<br />

occur.<br />

8.3.4 Inhomogeneous Medium: Analytic Results<br />

For practical problems, notably the oscillation of solar neutrinos on<br />

their way out of the Sun, one may e<strong>as</strong>ily solve the equation i∂ z Ψ =<br />

−KΨ numerically <strong>for</strong> prescribed profiles of the electron density and<br />

neutrino production rates. The main features of such calculations, however,<br />

can be understood analytically because <strong>for</strong> certain simple density<br />

profiles one can find analytic representations of Eq. (8.36) independently<br />

of the adiabatic approximation.<br />

Consider the situation where a ν e is produced in a medium and<br />

subsequently escapes into vacuum through a monotonically decre<strong>as</strong>ing<br />

density profile. Because in the adiabatic limit the production and detection<br />

points are separated by many oscillation lengths, the oscillation<br />

pattern will be entirely w<strong>as</strong>hed out and one may use average probabilities<br />

<strong>for</strong> the flavor content. Initially, the projection of the polarization<br />

vector on the “magnetic field” direction is cos 2θ where θ is the medium<br />

mixing angle at the production point. Because the component of P in<br />

the B direction is conserved when B changes adiabatically, the final average<br />

projection of P on the 3-axis is cos 2θ 0 cos 2θ. Then the survival<br />

probability is prob(ν e →ν e ) = 1 2 (1 + cos 2θ 0 cos 2θ). This result applies<br />

in the adiabatic limit whether or not a resonance occurs.<br />

Next, drop the adiabatic condition but <strong>as</strong>sume that the production<br />

and detection points are many oscillation lengths away on opposite<br />

sides of a resonance so that the oscillation pattern remains w<strong>as</strong>hed out;<br />

then it remains sufficient to consider average probabilities. In this c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

it is useful to write<br />

prob(ν e →ν e ) = 1 2 + ( 1 2 − p) cos 2θ 0 cos 2θ, (8.40)<br />

where the correction p to the adiabatic approximation is the probability<br />

that the neutrino jumps from one branch of the dispersion relation to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!