28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216 Chapter 6<br />

are<br />

k1<br />

2<br />

ωP<br />

2<br />

⎧<br />

1 + 3T/m e Cl<strong>as</strong>sical,<br />

⎪⎨ [ ( ) ]<br />

3 1 1 + vF<br />

=<br />

log − 1 Degenerate,<br />

vF<br />

⎪⎩<br />

2 2v F 1 − v F<br />

∞<br />

Relativistic.<br />

(6.49)<br />

Then, <strong>for</strong> k > k 1 the four-momentum is space-like, ω 2 − k 2 < 0.<br />

As discussed in Sect. 6.2.2 there is nothing wrong with a space-like<br />

four-momentum of an excitation. In media with electron resonances<br />

such <strong>as</strong> water or air even (transverse) photons exhibit this behavior<br />

which allows kinematically <strong>for</strong> their Cherenkov emission e → eγ or<br />

absorption γe → e. In a pl<strong>as</strong>ma, transverse excitations are always<br />

time-like and thus cannot be Cherenkov absorbed. Their lowest-order<br />

damping mechanism is Thomson scattering γe → eγ which is not included<br />

because it is an O(α 2 ) effect. Longitudinal excitations with<br />

k > k 1 , in contr<strong>as</strong>t, can and will be Cherenkov absorbed by the ambient<br />

electrons, leading to an O(α) damping rate. It corresponds to an<br />

imaginary part of the dispersion relation (an imaginary part of π L ).<br />

In the expression Eq. (6.36) this damping effect corresponds to a<br />

vanishing denominator, essentially to P ·K = 0, which occurs when the<br />

intermediate electron in Compton scattering “goes on-shell.” Evidently,<br />

P · K = Eω − p · k can never vanish <strong>for</strong> k < ω while <strong>for</strong> k > ω there are<br />

always some electrons, even in a nonrelativistic pl<strong>as</strong>ma, which satisfy<br />

this condition. When the ph<strong>as</strong>e velocity ω/k becomes of the order of<br />

a typical thermal velocity the number of electrons which match the<br />

Cherenkov condition becomes large, and then the damping of pl<strong>as</strong>mons<br />

becomes strong. Because v ∗ me<strong>as</strong>ures a typical electron velocity this<br />

occurs <strong>for</strong> k > ∼ ω/v ∗ (Fig. 6.4). There<strong>for</strong>e, while nothing dramatic<br />

happens where the dispersion relation crosses the light cone, it fizzles<br />

out near the “electron cone.” For k > ∼ ω/v ∗ there are no organized<br />

oscillations of the electrons—longitudinal modes no longer exist.<br />

This damping mechanism of pl<strong>as</strong>ma waves w<strong>as</strong> first discussed by<br />

Landau (1946) and is named after him. A calculation in terms of Cherenkov<br />

absorption w<strong>as</strong> per<strong>for</strong>med by Tsytovich (1961). In the cl<strong>as</strong>sical<br />

limit the Landau damping rate (the imaginary part of the frequency) is<br />

Γ L<br />

ω P<br />

=<br />

√ π<br />

8<br />

(<br />

kD<br />

k<br />

) 3<br />

e − k2 D<br />

2k 2<br />

= √ π<br />

( 5<br />

2<br />

) 3/2 ( ) ωP 3<br />

− 5<br />

e 2<br />

v ∗ k<br />

ω 2 P<br />

v 2 ∗k 2 , (6.50)<br />

where k D = 4πα n e /T is the Debye screening scale. (Note that ω 2 P/k 2 D =<br />

T/m e = v 2 ∗/5.) For a given wave number a pl<strong>as</strong>mon must be viewed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!