28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

220 Chapter 6<br />

(∂ t J = 0) are not screened. The magnetic field <strong>as</strong>sociated with a stationary<br />

current is the same at a distance whether or not the pl<strong>as</strong>ma<br />

is present.<br />

Not so <strong>for</strong> the electric field <strong>as</strong>sociated with a charge. In the static<br />

limit one finds<br />

π L (0, k) = 4α π<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

dp f p p (v + v −1 ). (6.55)<br />

Because this expression does not depend on k it can be identified with<br />

the square of a fixed wave number k S , leading to Poisson’s equation in<br />

the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

(<br />

k 2 + k 2 S<br />

)<br />

Φ(k) = ρ(k). (6.56)<br />

Because <strong>for</strong> a point-like source this gives a Yukawa potential<br />

Φ(r) ∝ r −1 → r −1 e −k Sr<br />

(6.57)<br />

electric charges are screened <strong>for</strong> distances exceeding about k −1<br />

S .<br />

Evaluating Eq. (6.55) explicitly in the cl<strong>as</strong>sical limit reproduces the<br />

well-known Debye screening scale (Debye and Hückel 1923; <strong>for</strong> a textbook<br />

discussion see Landau and Lifshitz 1958)<br />

k 2 S = k 2 D = 4πα n e<br />

T<br />

= m e<br />

T ω2 P. (6.58)<br />

At this point one recognizes that kD<br />

2 is independent of the electron<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s, in contr<strong>as</strong>t with the pl<strong>as</strong>ma frequency ωP. 2 There<strong>for</strong>e, it is no<br />

longer justified to ignore the ions or nuclei; they contribute little to<br />

dispersion because of their reduced Thomson scattering amplitude, but<br />

they contribute equally to screening. There<strong>for</strong>e, one finds kS 2 = kD 2 + ki<br />

2<br />

with<br />

k 2 i<br />

= 4πα<br />

T<br />

∑<br />

n j Zj 2 , (6.59)<br />

j<br />

where the sum is over all species j with charge Z j e.<br />

Comparing Eq. (6.55) with the corresponding expression <strong>for</strong> the<br />

pl<strong>as</strong>ma frequency Eq. (6.40) reveals that in the relativistic limit (v = 1)<br />

k 2 D = 3ω 2 P. It is clear that apart from a numerical factor they must<br />

be the same because a relativistic pl<strong>as</strong>ma h<strong>as</strong> only one natural scale,<br />

namely a typical electron energy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!