28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

130 Chapter 4<br />

4.3.2 Bremsstrahlung Emission of Neutrino Pairs<br />

In order to calculate the neutrino pair emission rate explicitly turn<br />

first to the nondegenerate limit <strong>for</strong> which one uses Γ σ and s(x) given<br />

in Eq. (4.7) and the integrals of Tab. 4.1. The average energy of a<br />

neutrino pair is (s 4 /s 3 ) T ≈ 4.36 T and the total energy-loss rate is<br />

Q ND<br />

νν = 2048<br />

385 π 7/2 C2 AG 2 Fα 2 π<br />

n 2 BT 11/2<br />

,<br />

m 5/2<br />

N<br />

ϵ ND<br />

νν = 2.4×10 17 erg g −1 s −1 ρ 15 T 5.5<br />

MeV, (4.23)<br />

with ρ 15 = ρ/10 15 g cm −3 , T MeV = T/MeV, and ϵ ND<br />

νν<br />

= Q ND<br />

νν /ρ is the<br />

energy-loss rate per unit m<strong>as</strong>s.<br />

For the degenerate rate one uses Eqs. (4.9). The average energy of<br />

a neutrino pair is (s 4 /s 3 ) T ≈ 5.78 T and the total energy-loss rate is 21<br />

Q D νν = 41π<br />

4725 C2 A G 2 F α 2 π p F T 8 ,<br />

ϵ D νν = 4.4×10 13 erg g −1 s −1 ρ −2/3<br />

15 T 8 MeV. (4.24)<br />

One can correct <strong>for</strong> a nonvanishing value of the pion m<strong>as</strong>s by virtue of<br />

Eq. (4.12).<br />

For a mixture of protons and neutrons the same remarks <strong>as</strong> in<br />

Sect. 4.2.6 apply. Apart from a small correction the neutrino coupling<br />

is isovector (C p A ≈ −CA) n so that α 0 ≈ 0 while the other α’s are<br />

approximately equal (Appendix B). For degenerate conditions, with a<br />

small modification the dependence on the proton concentration is the<br />

same <strong>as</strong> that shown in Fig. 4.4. Again, the absolutely dominating contribution<br />

is from np collisions unless protons are so rare that they are<br />

nondegenerate. 22<br />

21 Friman and Maxwell’s (1979) total energy-loss rate is 2/3 of the one found here.<br />

Apparently they did not include the crossterm in the squared matrix element, i.e.<br />

the third term in Eq. (4.2).<br />

22 This conclusion, b<strong>as</strong>ed on the work of Brinkmann and Turner (1988), is in<br />

conflict with the results of Friman and Maxwell (1979). They found that Q νν w<strong>as</strong><br />

proportional to the proton Fermi momentum which is relatively small in neutronstar<br />

matter. On the other hand, <strong>for</strong> small proton concentrations Brinkmann and<br />

Turner’s p F in Eq. (4.24) approaches the neutron Fermi momentum. I am in no<br />

position to decide between these conflicting results.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!