28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

498 Chapter 13<br />

so that the speed of light and that of neutrinos are equal to within<br />

(Longo 1987; Stodolsky 1988)<br />

∣ c ν − c ∣∣∣∣ γ<br />

∣ c < ∼ 2×10 −9 , (13.3)<br />

γ<br />

<strong>as</strong>suming an uncertainty of ±3 h in the relative duration of the transit<br />

times from the LMC to us. This w<strong>as</strong> interpreted <strong>as</strong> the most stringent<br />

test of special relativity to date in the sense that it proves with high<br />

precision the universality of a relativistic limiting velocity. 82<br />

This result can also be interpreted <strong>as</strong> testing the weak equivalence<br />

principle of general relativity (Krauss and Tremaine 1988). In the post-<br />

Newtonian approximation one predicts that a gravitational potential<br />

V (r) delays a light signal (Shapiro time delay) by an amount<br />

∫ A<br />

∆t = −2 V [r(t)] dt, (13.4)<br />

E<br />

where the integral is taken along the trajectory r(t) of the beam between<br />

the points of emission (E) and absorption (A). This delay is the same<br />

<strong>for</strong> neutrinos and photons to within<br />

∣ ∆t ν − ∆t ∣∣∣∣ γ<br />

< 0.7−4×10 −3 , (13.5)<br />

∣ ∆t γ<br />

where the uncertainty reflects the uncertain modelling of the gravitational<br />

potential between Earth and SN 1987A. 83 This result h<strong>as</strong> been<br />

used to constrain the parameters of a specific model of C- and P-<br />

violating gravitational <strong>for</strong>ces (Almeida, Mats<strong>as</strong>, and Natale 1989), and<br />

to constrain the parameters of a cl<strong>as</strong>s of nonmetric theories of gravity<br />

(Coley and Tremaine 1988).<br />

13.3.2 Neutrinos vs. Antineutrinos<br />

Assuming that the first event at Kamiokande represents the prompt ν e<br />

burst one may also constrain the difference in transit time between ν e<br />

and ν e and thus confirm the equivalence principle between matter and<br />

antimatter (LoSecco 1988; Pakv<strong>as</strong>a, Simmons, and Weiler 1989). Of<br />

course, in order to make such results reliable one would need to observe<br />

the prompt burst from a future SN with greater statistical significance.<br />

82 For a recent laboratory experiment which addresses the Lorentz limiting velocity,<br />

see Greene et al. (1991), and references there to earlier works. See also the book<br />

by Will (1993).<br />

83 See Will (1993) <strong>for</strong> a review of many other empirical tests of general relativity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!