28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anomalous Stellar Energy Losses Bounded by Observations 85<br />

understood from the relatively steep density dependence of the pl<strong>as</strong>ma<br />

neutrino emission rate which is most efficient at the center.<br />

In order to prevent the core m<strong>as</strong>s from exceeding its standard value<br />

by more than 5% (δM c < 0.025 M ⊙ ) one must require F ν ∼ < 3 or<br />

⟨ϵ x ⟩ ∼ < 2⟨ϵ ν ⟩. According to the Sweigart and Gross (1978) red-giant sequences<br />

the neutrino luminosity of the core at helium ignition is approximately<br />

1 L ⊙ so that ⟨ϵ ν ⟩ ≈ 4 erg g −1 s −1 . There<strong>for</strong>e, an approximate<br />

analytic criterion to constrain a nonstandard energy loss is<br />

ϵ x ∼ < 10 erg g −1 s −1 , (2.43)<br />

where ϵ x is to be evaluated in a helium pl<strong>as</strong>ma at the average density of<br />

the core of about 2×10 5 g cm −3 (the central density is about 10 6 g cm −3 )<br />

and at the almost constant temperature of T = 10 8 K. The standard<br />

neutrino pl<strong>as</strong>ma emission rate evaluated at 2×10 5 g cm −3 and 10 8 K<br />

is 3 erg g −1 s −1 , in good agreement with the above average neutrino<br />

luminosity of the Sweigart and Gross models.<br />

Table 2.6. Incre<strong>as</strong>e of the core m<strong>as</strong>s at helium ignition because of the emission<br />

of pseudoscalars (Raffelt and Weiss 1995).<br />

α ′ [10 −26 ] δM c [M ⊙ ]<br />

0.0 0.000<br />

0.5 0.022<br />

1.0 0.036<br />

2.0 0.056<br />

A simple application of Eq. (2.43) is the c<strong>as</strong>e of bremsstrahlung<br />

emission of pseudoscalars e + 4 He → 4 He + e + a. For a degenerate<br />

medium the emission rate is given in Eq. (3.33); <strong>for</strong> T = 10 8 K it<br />

is approximately α ′ 2×10 27 erg g −1 s −1 with the “axion fine-structure<br />

constant” α ′ . Then, Eq. (2.43) yields<br />

α ′ ∼ < 0.5×10 −26 . (2.44)<br />

The same c<strong>as</strong>e w<strong>as</strong> treated numerically by Raffelt and Weiss (1995)<br />

who implemented the energy-loss rate Eq. (3.33) with varying values<br />

of α ′ in several red-giant evolutionary sequences. 13 They found the<br />

13 In a previous numerical treatment by Dearborn, Schramm, and Steigman (1986)<br />

the correct emission rate had not yet been available and so they overestimated the<br />

energy-loss rate by <strong>as</strong> much <strong>as</strong> a factor of 10 at the center of a red-giant core.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!