28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116 Chapter 3<br />

Finally, the matter of the galaxy would exert a leptonic <strong>for</strong>ce on<br />

neutrinos propagating, say, from a distant supernova to us. This effect<br />

would cause an energy-dependent dispersion of the me<strong>as</strong>urable neutrino<br />

burst (Sect. 13.3.3). However, when e L ∼ > 10 −20 , which is necessary to<br />

cause an interesting effect on supernova neutrinos, then the galactic<br />

leptonic charge is completely screened over the relevant length scales,<br />

even if the cosmic background neutrinos are relativistic.<br />

3.7 Graviton Emission from <strong>Stars</strong><br />

The one nonelectromagnetic long-range <strong>for</strong>ce that is actually known<br />

to exist is gravity. Whatever the ultimate quantum theory of gravity,<br />

there is little doubt that there will be quantized wave excitations, the<br />

gravitons. They would be m<strong>as</strong>sless spin-2 particles. In fact, gravity is<br />

the only possible <strong>for</strong>ce that can be mediated by a m<strong>as</strong>sless spin-2 boson<br />

because <strong>as</strong> a source it needs a conserved rank-2 tensor. The energymomentum<br />

tensor, which acts <strong>as</strong> a source <strong>for</strong> the gravitational field, is<br />

the only example.<br />

Cl<strong>as</strong>sical gravitational waves are an inevitable consequence of Einstein’s<br />

theory of general relativity. The orbital decay of the binary<br />

pulsar PSR 1913+16 (Hulse and Taylor 1975) yields firm evidence <strong>for</strong><br />

their emission (Taylor and Weisberg 1989; Damour and Taylor 1991).<br />

Gravitons can be produced in hot pl<strong>as</strong>m<strong>as</strong> in analogy to axions or<br />

neutrino pairs; typical processes are bremsstrahlung e + p → e + p + g<br />

(graviton g) and the Primakoff effect (gravitons have a two-photon<br />

coupling). Because of their weak interaction gravitons can freely escape<br />

once produced in the interior of stars. Early calculations of the<br />

emission rates were summarized by Papini and Valluri (1977). More<br />

recent discussions include Schäfer and Dehnen (1983), Gould (1985),<br />

and del Campo and Ford (1988). As the graviton coupling involves the<br />

inverse of the Planck m<strong>as</strong>s (1.2×10 19 GeV) the graviton luminosity of<br />

stars is inevitably small. For the Sun it is about 10 15 erg s −1 ≈ 10 −19 L ⊙ ,<br />

much too small to be of any observational relevance. The same conclusion<br />

holds <strong>for</strong> other stars.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, gravity itself illustrates that the mediation of long-range<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces is a far more important effect of low-m<strong>as</strong>s bosons than their<br />

thermal emission from stellar pl<strong>as</strong>m<strong>as</strong>. Unless, of course, they only<br />

couple to the fermion spins rather than to a “charge.” Pseudoscalars<br />

such <strong>as</strong> axions are in that category.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!