28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supernova Neutrinos 445<br />

presence of magnetic fields were discussed by a number of authors. 68<br />

Because of the left-handedness of the weak interaction both neutrinos<br />

and antineutrinos would be emitted preferentially in the same direction<br />

singled out by the magnetic field. Its effects become substantial only <strong>for</strong><br />

field strengths near and above the critical strength m 2 e/e = 4.4×10 13 G.<br />

In order to obtain neutron-star kick velocities of several 100 km s −1<br />

it appears that magnetic fields several orders of magnitude larger are<br />

required which, however, may possibly exist in some SN cores after<br />

collapse. Also, the <strong>as</strong>ymmetric emission of neutrinos may be aided by<br />

the <strong>for</strong>mation of a pion condensate and perhaps other processes (Parfenov<br />

1988, 1989). Certain special field configurations seem to allow<br />

<strong>for</strong> significantly anisotropic neutrino emission (Bisnovatyi-Kogan and<br />

Janka 1995).<br />

It remains to be seen if sufficiently anisotropic neutrino emission can<br />

be established <strong>as</strong> a generic property of a protoneutron star’s Kelvin-<br />

Helmholtz cooling ph<strong>as</strong>e. Meanwhile, the neutrino rocket engine remains<br />

a f<strong>as</strong>cinating speculation <strong>for</strong> accelerating neutron stars.<br />

11.6 Future Supernovae<br />

The neutrino observations from SN 1987A gave us a wealth of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

in the sense that they confirmed the broad picture of neutrino<br />

cooling of the compact object <strong>for</strong>med after collapse. The data were<br />

much too sparse, however, to distinguish between, say, different equations<br />

of state or different <strong>as</strong>sumptions concerning neutrino transport, or<br />

to detect or significantly constrain neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses and mixing parameters.<br />

Some worry is caused by the apparent anomalies of the SN 1987A<br />

data, notably the angular distribution of the secondary charged particles.<br />

No doubt it would be extremely important to observe a SN<br />

neutrino signal with greater statistical significance, or from a greater<br />

distance. What is the prospect <strong>for</strong> such an observation<br />

SN neutrinos can be observed in a number of underground detectors<br />

which are operational now or in the near future, or which have only<br />

been proposed. An extensive overview w<strong>as</strong> given by Burrows, Klein,<br />

and Gandhi (1992). Of the experiments which will become operational<br />

within the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future, the upcoming Superkamiokande water<br />

Cherenkov detector (Sect. 10.9) would yield by far the largest num-<br />

68 O’Connell and Matese (1969a,b); Matese and O’Connell (1969); Ivanov<br />

and Shul’man (1980, 1981); Dorofeev, Rodionov, and Ternov (1984); Loskutov<br />

(1984a,b); Cheng, Schramm, and Truran (1993).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!