28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Supernova Neutrinos 415<br />

time) on 23 February 1987 while the first evidence <strong>for</strong> optical brightening<br />

w<strong>as</strong> found at 10:38 UT on plates taken by McNaught (1987)—see<br />

Fig. 11.9.<br />

The main neutrino observations come from the Irvine-Michigan-<br />

Brookhaven (IMB) and the Kamiokande II water Cherenkov detectors,<br />

facilities originally built to search <strong>for</strong> proton decay, while a less significant<br />

me<strong>as</strong>urement is from the Baksan Scintillator Telescope (BST).<br />

A likely spurious observation is from the Mont Blanc Liquid Scintillator<br />

Detector (LSD). It preceded the other observations by about 5 h,<br />

with no contemporaneous signal at Mont Blanc with the other signals,<br />

and no contemporaneous signal at the other detectors with the Mont<br />

Blanc event. The Mont Blanc detector w<strong>as</strong> built to search <strong>for</strong> neutrinos<br />

from core collapse supernovae, except that it w<strong>as</strong> optimized <strong>for</strong> galactic<br />

events within a distance of about 10 kpc. The neutrino output of<br />

a normal SN in the LMC could not have caused an observable signal<br />

at Mont Blanc; the reported events probably represent a background<br />

fluctuation.<br />

Koshiba (1992) h<strong>as</strong> given a lively account of the exciting and initially<br />

somewhat confusing story of the neutrino me<strong>as</strong>urements and their<br />

interpretation. Early summaries of the implications <strong>for</strong> <strong>as</strong>trophysics<br />

and particle physics of the neutrino and electromagnetic observations<br />

were written, <strong>for</strong> example, by Schramm (1987), Arnett et al. (1989),<br />

and Schramm and Truran (1990). A more recent review of SN 1987A<br />

is McCray (1993). A nontechnical overview w<strong>as</strong> provided in a book by<br />

Murdin (1990).<br />

For the present purposes the bottom line is that SN 1987A broadly<br />

confirmed our understanding of SN physics <strong>as</strong> outlined in Sect. 11.1.<br />

A remaining sore point is the lack of a pulsar observation in the SN<br />

remnant so that one may continue to speculate that a black hole h<strong>as</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>med in the collapse.<br />

11.3.2 Neutrino Observations<br />

In the IMB and Kamiokande water Cherenkov detectors neutrinos are<br />

me<strong>as</strong>ured by the Cherenkov light emitted by secondary charged particles,<br />

e ± <strong>for</strong> the relatively low-energy (anti)neutrinos emitted from a<br />

stellar collapse. The IMB detector is now defunct while Kamiokande<br />

continues to me<strong>as</strong>ure, <strong>for</strong> example, solar neutrinos until the much larger<br />

Superkamiokande detector will take up operation in 1996. In the Baksan<br />

Scintillator Telescope (BST) one me<strong>as</strong>ures the scintillation light<br />

produced by charged secondary particles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!