28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144 Chapter 4<br />

The same result can be found with the above methods applied to the<br />

spatial part of the vector current. E<strong>as</strong>ier still, it can be obtained directly<br />

from Eq. (4.61). To this end note that photon emission by an electron<br />

involves nonrelativistically (e/m e ) p = ev so that we must substitute<br />

˙σ → ˙v = a. The role of k (axions) is played by the polarization<br />

vector ϵ (photons) so that k 2 = ω 2 must be replaced by ϵ 2 = 1. With<br />

(C A /2f a ) → e, using α = e 2 /4π, and inserting a factor of 2 <strong>for</strong> two<br />

photon polarization states completes the translation.<br />

In order to understand the radiation spectrum consider a single<br />

“infinitely hard” collision with ˙σ(t) = ∆σ δ(t). The radiation power is<br />

dI a<br />

dω = (<br />

CN<br />

2f a<br />

) 2<br />

ω 2<br />

12π 2 |∆σ|2 . (4.63)<br />

For photons one obtains the familiar flat bremsstrahlung spectrum<br />

dI γ /dω = (2α/3π)|∆v| 2 which is hardened, <strong>for</strong> axions, by the additional<br />

factor ω 2 from their derivative coupling.<br />

In the <strong>for</strong>m Eq. (4.63) the total amount of energy radiated in a single<br />

collision is infinite. In practice, collisions are not arbitrarily hard,<br />

and the backreaction of the radiation process on the emitter must be<br />

included. This is not rigorously possible in a cl<strong>as</strong>sical calculation, it requires<br />

a quantum-mechanical treatment. There<strong>for</strong>e, a cl<strong>as</strong>sical analysis<br />

is useful only <strong>for</strong> the soft part of the spectrum where backreactions can<br />

be ignored, i.e. <strong>for</strong> radiation frequencies far below the kinetic energy<br />

of the emitter. In a thermal environment, a cl<strong>as</strong>sical treatment then<br />

appears re<strong>as</strong>onable <strong>for</strong> ω < ∼ T .<br />

Next, consider a large random sequence of n hard collisions with a<br />

spin trajectory<br />

n∑<br />

˙σ(t) = ∆σ i δ(t − t i ). (4.64)<br />

i=1<br />

This yields the average radiation intensity per collision of<br />

d ˙ I a<br />

dω = (<br />

CN<br />

2f a<br />

) 2<br />

ω 2<br />

12π 2 Γ coll ⟨(∆σ) 2 ⟩ F (ω), (4.65)<br />

where Γ coll is the average collision rate and ⟨(∆σ) 2 ⟩ is the average<br />

squared change of the spin in a collision. Further,<br />

1<br />

n∑ ∆σ i · ∆σ j cos[ω(t i − t j )]<br />

F (ω) = 1 + lim<br />

, (4.66)<br />

n→∞ n<br />

⟨(∆σ) 2 ⟩<br />

i,j=1<br />

i≠j<br />

where the first term (the “diagonal” part of the double sum) gives the<br />

total radiation power <strong>as</strong> an incoherent sum of individual collisions. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!