28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182 Chapter 5<br />

However, an ongoing experimental project at the Institute <strong>for</strong> Nuclear<br />

<strong>Physics</strong> in Novosibirsk may be able to improve the helioscope<br />

significantly. The conversion magnet h<strong>as</strong> been gimballed so that it can<br />

track the Sun, providing much longer exposure times. First results can<br />

be expected <strong>for</strong> late 1995—see Vorobyov and Kolokolov (1995) <strong>for</strong> a<br />

status report.<br />

Another possibility would be to use the straight sections of the<br />

beam pipe of the LEP accelerator at CERN <strong>as</strong> an axion helioscope.<br />

Hoogeveen and Stuart (1992) have calculated the times and dates of<br />

alignment with the Sun. They proposed an experimental setup that<br />

might allow one to reach a sensitivity in g aγ down to 4×10 −10 GeV −1 ,<br />

which would be very impressive, but still far from the globular-cluster<br />

bound Eq. (5.23).<br />

Finally, P<strong>as</strong>chos and Ziout<strong>as</strong> (1994) proposed to use a single crystal<br />

<strong>as</strong> a detector where the Primakoff conversion of solar axions is coherently<br />

enhanced over the electric fields of many atoms. Put another way,<br />

one would expect a strong enhancement via Bragg scattering. Even<br />

with this improvement, however, it does not seem possible to beat the<br />

bound from globular-cluster stars.<br />

5.4.3 Shining Light through Walls<br />

Instead of using the solar axion flux one can make one’s own by shining<br />

a l<strong>as</strong>er beam through a long transverse magnetic field region where it<br />

develops an axion component. Then the l<strong>as</strong>er beam is blocked while<br />

the weakly interacting axions traverse the obstacle. In a second magnet<br />

they are back-converted into photons so that one “shines light through<br />

walls” (Anselm 1985; G<strong>as</strong>perini 1987; van Bibber et al. 1987). Instead<br />

of a freely propagating beam one may use resonant cavities on either<br />

side of the wall which are coupled by the axion field (Hoogeveen and<br />

Ziegenhagen 1991). Another possibility to improve the sensitivity is to<br />

use squeezed light (Hoogeveen 1990).<br />

An actual experiment w<strong>as</strong> per<strong>for</strong>med by Ruoso et al. (1992) who<br />

used two superconducting magnets of length 440 cm each with a field<br />

strength of 3.7 T. The light beam w<strong>as</strong> trapped in a resonant cavity<br />

in the first magnet, allowing <strong>for</strong> about 200 traversals; the incident<br />

l<strong>as</strong>er power w<strong>as</strong> 1.5 W. At the end of the second magnet photons were<br />

searched <strong>for</strong> by a photomultiplier. For an axion m<strong>as</strong>s m < a ∼ 10 −3 eV an<br />

upper bound g aγ < 0.7×10 −6 GeV −1 w<strong>as</strong> found.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!