28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200 Chapter 6<br />

The problem of the physical momentum flow <strong>as</strong>sociated with a wave<br />

will be of no concern to the issues addressed in this book. In microscopic<br />

reactions the quantity which appears in the law of “energy-momentum<br />

conservation” is the wave vector. For example, in the pl<strong>as</strong>ma process<br />

γ → νν the momenta of the outgoing neutrinos must balance against<br />

the wave vector of the decaying electromagnetic excitation. In this<br />

book dispersion effects will be important only <strong>for</strong> pulse propagation<br />

from distant sources, <strong>for</strong> particle oscillation effects, and <strong>for</strong> energymomentum<br />

conservation in microscopic reactions. In these c<strong>as</strong>es the<br />

naive interpretation of ¯hk <strong>as</strong> a particle’s momentum is safe. For the<br />

remainder of this book the wave number (or pseudomomentum) and<br />

the momentum of a field excitation will not be distinguished.<br />

6.2.3 Wave-Function Renormalization<br />

In particle reactions the main impact of medium-induced modifications<br />

of the dispersion relations is on the kinematics, notably if a threshold<br />

condition is involved. One is thus tempted to proceed with the usual<br />

Feynman rules and take account of the dispersion relations only in<br />

the ph<strong>as</strong>e-space integration, notably in the law of energy-momentum<br />

conservation. In most practical c<strong>as</strong>es this approach causes no problems,<br />

although an exception are interactions involving longitudinal pl<strong>as</strong>mons<br />

(Sect. 6.3). There<strong>for</strong>e, one should be aware that the matrix element<br />

also must be modified because of the subtle issue of what one means<br />

with a “particle” in a medium.<br />

After a spatial Fourier trans<strong>for</strong>m the equations of motion <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Fourier components ϕ k of a free field are those of a harmonic oscillator.<br />

Interpreting the amplitude ϕ k and its velocity ˙ϕ k <strong>as</strong> conjugate variables,<br />

the canonical quantization procedure leads to quantized energy levels<br />

¯hω k , where ω k is the cl<strong>as</strong>sical frequency of the mode k according to its<br />

dispersion relation. Conversely, a quantized excitation with energy ¯hω k<br />

h<strong>as</strong> a certain field strength which determines its coupling strength to a<br />

source, e.g. the coupling strength of a photon to an electron.<br />

In a medium, the energy <strong>as</strong>sociated with a frequency ω k is still ¯hω k .<br />

However, because of the presence of interaction energy between ϕ and<br />

the medium, the field strength <strong>as</strong>sociated with a quantized excitation<br />

is modified. For example, photons with a given frequency couple with<br />

a different strength to electrons in a medium than they do in vacuum.<br />

This modification can be lumped into a “renormalization factor” √ Z<br />

of the coupling strength of external photon lines in a Feynman graph.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!