28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

246 Chapter 6<br />

Dicus and Repko (1993) who worked out explicitly the matrix elements<br />

and cross sections. From their results one can extract the <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

scattering amplitude which leads to a refractive index <strong>for</strong> ν l (l = e, µ, τ)<br />

in a photon bath,<br />

[<br />

)]<br />

n refr − 1 = α 4π<br />

G F<br />

m 2 W<br />

1 + 4 3 ln ( m<br />

2<br />

W<br />

m 2 l<br />

⟨E γ ⟩n γ , (6.114)<br />

where ⟨. . .⟩ means an average. Numerically, the term in square brackets<br />

is 32.9 <strong>for</strong> l = e and thus not small, but with 4π in the denominator the<br />

whole expression is still of order αG F /m 2 W , i.e. of order 41 G 2 F. (See also<br />

Nieves, Pal, and Unger 1983; Nieves 1987; Langacker and Liu 1992.)<br />

Because the ν-γ term is so small a larger refractive index arises<br />

if one includes the second term in the expansion Eq. (6.104) of the<br />

gauge-boson propagators. Of course, in graphs (a) and (c) of Fig. 6.15<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward scattering implies Q = 0 so that only the first term contributes,<br />

except when f = ν where the exchange graph h<strong>as</strong> Q ≠ 0. This c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

and graphs (b) and (d) yield a second-order contribution (Nötzold and<br />

Raffelt 1988). For a neutrino of flavor l which is either e, µ, or τ it is<br />

n refr − 1 = 8√ 2 G F<br />

3m 2 Z<br />

+ 8√ 2 G F<br />

3m 2 W<br />

(<br />

⟨Eνl ⟩n νl + ⟨E νl ⟩n νl<br />

)<br />

(<br />

⟨El −⟩n l − + ⟨E l +⟩n l +<br />

)<br />

. (6.115)<br />

In this c<strong>as</strong>e the contributions from background fermions and antifermions<br />

add with the same sign, and the global sign remains the same <strong>for</strong><br />

ν and ν <strong>as</strong> test particles. In practice, only an electron-positron background<br />

is of relevance in the early universe so that ν τ , <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

only feels a second-order contribution from other ν τ ’s and ν τ ’s. These<br />

results are of order G 2 F/α and thus they are the dominant contribution<br />

in a CP-symmetric pl<strong>as</strong>ma.<br />

One-loop corrections to the amplitudes of Fig. 6.15 yield other<br />

higher-order terms which are of order G 2 F like Eq. (6.114). They are<br />

still interesting because the loops involve charged leptons with a m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

depending on their flavor. There<strong>for</strong>e, the universality of the effective<br />

neutral-current interaction is broken on this level, leading to different<br />

refractive indices <strong>for</strong> different ν l . Between ν e and ν µ or ν τ the medium<br />

is already birefringent to lowest order from ν e -e charged-current interactions.<br />

Between ν µ and ν τ the one-loop correction dominates. Assum-<br />

41 Note that m −2<br />

Z<br />

= cos2 Θ W sin 2 Θ W<br />

√<br />

2 GF /πα and m −2<br />

W<br />

= sin2 Θ W<br />

√<br />

2 GF /πα.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!