28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

254 Chapter 7<br />

interactions dominate. For example, even otherwise sterile neutrinos<br />

should be thermally emitted from black holes which are thought to<br />

emit blackbody radiation of all physical fields. Equally, they would have<br />

been produced in the very early universe when quantum gravitational<br />

effects dominate. However, their present-day cosmic density, like that<br />

of primordial gravitons, would be very dilute relative to microwave<br />

background photons.<br />

If neutrinos were Majorana particles they could still have a m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

even though it could not arise from the usual Higgs field which induces<br />

Dirac m<strong>as</strong>ses. However, a Majorana m<strong>as</strong>s could arise from the<br />

interaction with a second Higgs field which also develops a vacuum expectation<br />

value. Then the smallness of the neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses could be<br />

due to a small vacuum value of the new Higgs field while the Yukawa<br />

couplings would not need to be anomalously small.<br />

It is also possible that the r.h. components of the neutrinos do exist,<br />

but are themselves (sterile) Majorana fermions with large m<strong>as</strong>ses.<br />

It should be noted that any Dirac fermion (four components) can be<br />

viewed <strong>as</strong> a combination of two Majorana fermions (two components<br />

each) with degenerate m<strong>as</strong>ses. Certain variations of such models (“seesaw<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s models”) predict <strong>for</strong> the light, interacting neutrinos<br />

m 1 : m 2 : m 3 = m 2 e : m 2 µ : m 2 τ or m 2 u : m 2 c : m 2 t . (7.1)<br />

The smallness of the neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses is then a suppression effect by<br />

the large m<strong>as</strong>s scale of the heavy sterile state whose m<strong>as</strong>s would arise,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, at the grand unification scale of 10 15 −10 16 GeV.<br />

For an elementary introduction to the most common models <strong>for</strong> neutrino<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses see, <strong>for</strong> example, Mohapatra and Pal (1991). The dizzying<br />

variety of such models alone attests to the fact that even very b<strong>as</strong>ic<br />

questions about the nature of neutrinos remain unanswered. While<br />

some m<strong>as</strong>s schemes like the see-saw relationship Eq. (7.1) are intriguing,<br />

they have no predictive power because there are many other possibilities.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, it is best to remain open to all possibilities which are<br />

not excluded by experimental or <strong>as</strong>trophysical arguments.<br />

7.1.3 Kinematical M<strong>as</strong>s Bounds<br />

Unsurprisingly, much experimental ef<strong>for</strong>t goes into attempts to me<strong>as</strong>ure<br />

or narrow down the range of possible neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses, an area where<br />

<strong>as</strong>trophysics and cosmology have made their most renowned contributions<br />

to particle physics. Direct laboratory experiments rely on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!