28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

548 Chapter 15<br />

argument to constrain ρ from the yield of 4 He and other light elements,<br />

and thus to constrain the effective number of neutrino degrees of freedom<br />

at nucleosynthesis (Yang et al. 1979, 1984; Olive et al. 1990; Walker<br />

et al. 1991). Because the number of low-m<strong>as</strong>s sequential neutrino families<br />

is now known to be 3, such constraints can be translated into<br />

constraints on the value of G N pertaining to the nucleosynthesis epoch.<br />

An extra neutrino species would add around 15% to ρ. It appears<br />

re<strong>as</strong>onably conservative to <strong>as</strong>sume that big-bang nucleosynthesis does<br />

not allow <strong>for</strong> a deviation of the standard number of effective neutrino<br />

degrees of freedom by more than 1 so that G N at that time must<br />

have been within about ±15% of its present-day value. It is possible,<br />

however, that G N w<strong>as</strong> considerably smaller if this reduction w<strong>as</strong> compensated<br />

by additional exotic degrees of freedom such <strong>as</strong> right-handed<br />

neutrinos which incre<strong>as</strong>e ρ. Moreover, it w<strong>as</strong> <strong>as</strong>sumed that Fermi’s<br />

constant had its present-day value at nucleosynthesis, contrary to the<br />

speculations discussed in Sect. 15.1. Still, barring <strong>for</strong>tuitous compensating<br />

effects, nucleosynthesis excludes an O(1) deviation of G N from<br />

its standard value at nucleosynthesis.<br />

This sort of result can be compared with the present-day bounds<br />

of Sect. 15.2.1 only by <strong>as</strong>suming a specific functional <strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> G N (t)<br />

which is often taken to be<br />

G N (t) = G N (t 0 ) (t 0 /t) β , (15.1)<br />

where t 0 refers to the present epoch. Assuming that G N at nucleosynthesis<br />

w<strong>as</strong> within ±50% of its standard value one finds |β| ∼ < 0.01 which<br />

would imply |ĠN/G N | today ∼ < 10 −12 yr −1 , at le<strong>as</strong>t a factor of ten below<br />

the present-day limits. One should keep in mind, however, that a powerlaw<br />

variation of G N is a relatively arbitrary <strong>as</strong>sumption. For example,<br />

in scalar-tensor extensions of general relativity such <strong>as</strong> the Brans-Dicke<br />

theory G N varies <strong>as</strong> a power law during the matter-dominated epoch<br />

while it remains constant when radiation dominates. Either way, while<br />

the nucleosynthesis bounds are probably somewhat more restrictive<br />

than the celestial-mechanics ones it is interesting that the resulting<br />

bounds |ĠN/G N | today ∼ < 1−10×10 −12 yr −1 are of the same general order<br />

of magnitude. They leave room <strong>for</strong> a considerable variation of G N over<br />

cosmic time scales.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!