28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

500 Chapter 13<br />

c) Long-Range Forces<br />

Speculating further one may imagine some sort of neutrino “fifth-<strong>for</strong>ce<br />

charge.” If electrons, protons, or dark-matter particles also carry such<br />

a charge the bending of the neutrino trajectory in the fifth-<strong>for</strong>ce field of<br />

the galaxy would lead to an energy-dependent time delay. This and related<br />

arguments were advanced by a number of authors (Pakv<strong>as</strong>a, Simmons,<br />

and Weiler 1989; Grifols, M<strong>as</strong>só, and Peris 1988, 1994; Fiorentini<br />

and Mezzorani 1989; Malaney, Starkman, and Tremaine 1995).<br />

The most plausible <strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> such a long-range interaction is one mediated<br />

by a m<strong>as</strong>sless vector boson, i.e. a new gauge interaction, perhaps<br />

related to a novel leptonic charge (Sect. 3.6.4). In this c<strong>as</strong>e neutrinos<br />

and antineutrinos would carry opposite charges so that the cosmic neutrino<br />

background would be essentially a neutral pl<strong>as</strong>ma with regard to<br />

the new interaction. The resulting screening effects then invalidate the<br />

SN 1987A argument (Dolgov and Raffelt 1995).<br />

Screening effects would not operate if the <strong>for</strong>ce were due to a spin-0<br />

or spin-2 boson which always cause attractive <strong>for</strong>ces. However, any<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce mediated by a m<strong>as</strong>sless spin-2 boson must couple to the energymomentum<br />

tensor and thus is identical with gravity. The <strong>for</strong>ce mediated<br />

by a scalar boson between a static source and a relativistic neutrino<br />

is suppressed by a Lorentz factor. There<strong>for</strong>e, even if scalar-mediated<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces existed between macroscopic bodies, their effect would be weakened<br />

<strong>for</strong> relativistic neutrinos.<br />

In summary, the SN 1987A signal does not seem to carry any simple<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation concerning putative nongravitational long-range <strong>for</strong>ces.<br />

d) <strong>Fundamental</strong> Length Scale<br />

Fujiwara h<strong>as</strong> proposed a quantum field theory where the velocity of particles<br />

incre<strong>as</strong>es with energy, leading to an energy-dependent advance of<br />

the arrival times by ∆t/t = − 1 2 (l 0E ν ) 2 . Here, l 0 is a fundamental length<br />

scale. Whatever the merits of this theory, a value l 0 ∼ < 10 −18 cm would<br />

not be in conflict with the SN 1987A neutrino signal (Fujiwara 1989).<br />

e) Lorentz Addition of Velocities<br />

If relativistic particles (photons, m<strong>as</strong>sless neutrinos) are emitted by a<br />

moving source (velocity v S ) their velocity c ′ in the laboratory frame<br />

should be equal to c (velocity in the frame of the source). The Galilean<br />

addition of velocities, on the other hand, would give c ′ = c + v S . In<br />

general one may <strong>as</strong>sume that velocities add according to c ′ = c + Kv S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!