28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

520 Chapter 13<br />

a charged-current scattering rate of 0.6×10 10 s −1 or an approximate<br />

cooling time-scale by r.h. neutrinos of ϵ −2<br />

CC 2×10 −10 s. The requirement<br />

that this timescale exceeds a few seconds leads to the constraint<br />

ϵ CC ∼ < 10 −5 , (13.18)<br />

in agreement with a result of Barbieri and Mohapatra (1989) while Raffelt<br />

and Seckel (1988) found a somewhat less restrictive limit of ϵ < CC ∼<br />

3×10 −5 . Laboratory experiments yield a limit of order ϵ < CC ∼ 3×10 −2<br />

(e.g. Jodidio et al. 1986) which is much weaker but does not depend<br />

on the <strong>as</strong>sumed existence of r.h. neutrinos. Mohapatra and Nussinov<br />

(1989) extended the SN 1987A bound to the c<strong>as</strong>e of r.h. Majorana<br />

neutrinos which mix with ν e .<br />

In order to constrain r.h. neutral currents, equivalent to constraining<br />

the m<strong>as</strong>s of putative r.h. Z ◦ gauge bosons, one considers the emission<br />

of r.h. neutrino pairs ν R ν R . The dominant emission process is by the<br />

nucleons of the medium; in a dilute medium it can be represented <strong>as</strong> the<br />

bremsstrahlung process NN → NNν R ν R . Apart from a global scaling<br />

factor ϵ 2 NC, the bremsstrahlung energy-loss rate <strong>for</strong> a nondegenerate<br />

medium w<strong>as</strong> given in Eq. (4.23). However, in a dense medium this<br />

rate probably saturates at around 10% nuclear density <strong>as</strong> in the c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

of axion emission (Sect. 4.6.7). Evaluating Eq. (4.23) at 10% nuclear<br />

density (ρ 15 = 0.03) and at T = 30 MeV, and applying the analytic<br />

criterion Eq. (13.8) one finds<br />

ϵ NC ∼ < 3×10 −3 . (13.19)<br />

This is less restrictive from what w<strong>as</strong> found by Raffelt and Seckel (1988)<br />

or Barbieri and Mohapatra (1989).<br />

The translation of a limit on ϵ NC into one on a r.h. gauge boson m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

depends on details of the couplings to quarks and leptons, and notably<br />

on the mixing angle between the new and the standard Z bosons. Detailed<br />

analyses were presented by Grifols and M<strong>as</strong>só (1990b), Grifols,<br />

M<strong>as</strong>só, and Rizzo (1990), and Rizzo (1991). Because these authors did<br />

not consider multiple-scattering effects and the resulting saturation of<br />

the bremsstrahlung process, their bounds on the Z ′ m<strong>as</strong>s are somewhat<br />

too restrictive, perhaps by a factor of 2 or 3. Still, m Z ′ h<strong>as</strong> to exceed<br />

at le<strong>as</strong>t 1 TeV, except <strong>for</strong> special choices of the mixing angle.<br />

The SN 1987A limits on r.h. neutral currents are weaker than those<br />

from big bang nucleosynthesis (ϵ < NC ∼ 10 −3 ) which are b<strong>as</strong>ed on the<br />

requirement that r.h. neutrinos must not have come to thermal equilibrium<br />

after the QCD ph<strong>as</strong>e transition (at T < ∼ 200 MeV) in the early<br />

universe (e.g. Olive, Schramm, and Steigman 1981; Ellis et al. 1986).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!