28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Particles Interacting with Electrons and Baryons 107<br />

to O(1 MeV), suppressing electron scattering and bremsstrahlung processes<br />

<strong>for</strong> temperatures below this scale (T < ∼ 5×10 9 K). Bremsstrahlung<br />

of νν pairs from the crust w<strong>as</strong> thought to dominate neutron-star<br />

cooling <strong>for</strong> some conditions while Pethick and Thorsson (1994) now<br />

find that it may never be important. These findings also diminish<br />

Iwamoto’s (1984) axion bound b<strong>as</strong>ed on the bremsstrahlung emission<br />

from neutron-star crusts.<br />

3.5.5 Applying the Energy-Loss Argument<br />

One may now e<strong>as</strong>ily derive <strong>as</strong>trophysical limits on the Yukawa couplings<br />

of scalars and pseudoscalars, in full analogy to Sect. 3.2.6 where the<br />

Compton emission rates were used. I begin with the same c<strong>as</strong>e that w<strong>as</strong><br />

considered there, namely the restriction ϵ < ∼ 10 erg g −1 s −1 in the cores<br />

of horizontal-branch stars. For nondegenerate conditions the emission<br />

rates are Eq. (3.30) and Eq. (3.31), respectively. They are proportional<br />

to ρ T 0.5 (pseudoscalar) and ρ T 2.5 (scalar). With ⟨ρ 4 ⟩ = 0.64, ⟨T8 0.5 ⟩ =<br />

0.82, ⟨T8 2.5 ⟩ = 0.48, and a chemical composition of pure helium one finds<br />

α ′ < { 1.4×10 −29 scalar,<br />

∼<br />

1.6×10 −25 pseudoscalar.<br />

(3.43)<br />

Comparing these limits with those from the Compton process Eq. (3.25)<br />

reveals that <strong>for</strong> scalars the present bremsstrahlung limit is more restrictive,<br />

<strong>for</strong> pseudoscalars the Compton one.<br />

Because bremsstrahlung is not suppressed in a degenerate pl<strong>as</strong>ma,<br />

one can also apply the helium-ignition argument of Sect. 2.5.2 which<br />

again requires ϵ < ∼ 10 erg g −1 s −1 at the same T ≈ 10 8 K, however at a<br />

density of around 10 6 g cm −3 . For these conditions the pl<strong>as</strong>ma is degenerate<br />

but weakly coupled (Appendix D) so that Debye screening should<br />

be an appropriate procedure. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>for</strong> the emission of pseudoscalars<br />

the emission rate Eq. (3.35) with F from Eq. (3.36) should<br />

be a re<strong>as</strong>onable approximation. The screening scale is dominated by<br />

the ions, k S = k i = 222 keV, the Fermi momentum is p F = 409 keV so<br />

that κ 2 = 0.15 while β F = 0.77, yielding F ≈ 1.8.<br />

In Fig. 3.6 the energy-loss rate of a helium pl<strong>as</strong>ma at T = 10 8 K<br />

is plotted <strong>as</strong> a function of density, including the Compton process,<br />

and the degenerate (D) and nondegenerate (ND) bremsstrahlung rates.<br />

This figure clarifies that bremsstrahlung, of course, is suppressed by<br />

degeneracy effects relative to the ND rates, but it is not a significantly<br />

decre<strong>as</strong>ing function of density. In this figure a simple interpolation<br />

(solid line) between the regimes of high and low degeneracy is shown

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!