28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Solar Neutrinos 345<br />

There exist v<strong>as</strong>t amounts of data concerning p-modes (periods between<br />

2 min and 1 h) which can be me<strong>as</strong>ured from the Doppler shifts<br />

of spectral lines on the solar surface. The main point is that one can<br />

establish a relationship between the multipole order of the oscillation<br />

pattern and the frequency. Because different vibration modes probe the<br />

sound speed at different depths one can invert the results to derive an<br />

empirical profile <strong>for</strong> the sound speed in the solar interior. The agreement<br />

with theoretical expectations <strong>for</strong> the square of the sound speed<br />

is better than about 0.3% except in the inner 0.2 R ⊙ which are not<br />

probed well by p-modes (Christensen-Dalsgaard, Proffitt, and Thompson<br />

1993; Dziembowski et al. 1994). Such results make it very difficult<br />

to contemplate the possibility that the Sun is radically different from<br />

a standard structure. On the other hand, these results are not precise<br />

enough to reduce the uncertainty of solar neutrino predictions which<br />

arise from the uncertainty of the opacity coefficients.<br />

The differences between the solar neutrino predictions of different<br />

authors are minimal when identical input parameters are used. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

the expected error resulting from solar modelling is very small,<br />

except that some key input parameters remain uncertain. The dominant<br />

source of uncertainty <strong>for</strong> the boron neutrino flux is the cross<br />

section <strong>for</strong> the reaction p + 7 Be → 8 B + γ which appears <strong>as</strong> a multiplicative<br />

factor <strong>for</strong> the solar flux prediction and thus is unrelated to<br />

solar modelling.<br />

A more <strong>as</strong>trophysical uncertainty are the opacity coefficients. Although<br />

they are thought to be well known <strong>for</strong> the conditions in the<br />

deep solar interior, even a relatively small error translates into a nonnegligible<br />

uncertainty of the boron flux prediction because of its steep<br />

temperature dependence. Crudely, a 10% error of the opacity coefficients<br />

translates into a 1% error of the central solar temperature and<br />

then into a 20% uncertainty of the boron flux. Indeed, a me<strong>as</strong>urement<br />

of the solar neutrino flux w<strong>as</strong> originally envisaged <strong>as</strong> a method to<br />

me<strong>as</strong>ure precisely the inner temperature of the Sun.<br />

The Sun <strong>as</strong> a neutrino source naturally h<strong>as</strong> received much attention<br />

in the literature because of its outstanding potential to finally confirm<br />

the existence of neutrino oscillations in nature. Because this book is<br />

not primarily on solar neutrinos I will limit my discussion to what I<br />

consider the most important features of this unique neutrino source,<br />

and the role it plays <strong>for</strong> particle physics. A lot of key material can be<br />

found in Bahcall’s (1989) book on solar neutrinos, in the more recent<br />

<strong>Physics</strong> Report on the solar interior by Turck-Chièze et al. (1993), and<br />

on the Sun in general in the book by Stix (1989).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!