28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Energy-Loss Argument 21<br />

scalars of<br />

κ x = 2(2π)9/2 αα x<br />

45<br />

Y e T 5/2 e m x/T<br />

m 1/2<br />

x m 4 e<br />

= 4.4×10 −3 cm 2 g −1 × α x Y e m −0.5<br />

keV T 2.5<br />

keV e m x/T , (1.22)<br />

where m keV = m x /keV and T keV = T/keV.<br />

The observed properties of the Sun then allow one to exclude a large<br />

range of parameters in the m x -α x -plane. The energy-loss rate integrated<br />

over the entire Sun must not exceed L ⊙ . Moreover, κ −1<br />

x must not exceed<br />

the standard photon contribution κ −1<br />

γ ≈ 1 g/cm 2 , apart from perhaps<br />

a factor of order unity. Taking a typical solar interior temperature<br />

of 1 keV, these requirements exclude the shaded region in Fig. 1.1.<br />

The d<strong>as</strong>hed line marks the parameters where the mfp is of order the<br />

solar radius.<br />

1.4 General Lesson<br />

What have we learned Weakly interacting particles, if they are not<br />

trapped in stars, carry away energy. For a degenerate object this energy<br />

loss leads to additional cooling, <strong>for</strong> a burning star it leads to an<br />

accelerated consumption of nuclear fuel. New particles would cause significant<br />

effects only if they could compete with neutrinos which already<br />

carry away energy directly from the interior.<br />

If new particles are trapped because of a short mfp, they contribute<br />

to the energy transfer. They dominate unless their mfp is shorter than<br />

that of photons. Such particles probably do not exist or else they<br />

would have been found in laboratory experiments. This justifies the<br />

usual focus on the energy-loss argument or “free streaming” limit.<br />

Still, the impact of new low-m<strong>as</strong>s particles is maximized <strong>for</strong> an mfp<br />

of order the stellar radius, a fact which is often not appreciated in the<br />

literature.<br />

If the particles were so heavy that they could not be produced by<br />

thermal processes in a stellar pl<strong>as</strong>ma they would be allowed <strong>for</strong> any coupling<br />

strength. How heavy is heavy The average energy of blackbody<br />

photons is about 3T . There<strong>for</strong>e, if m < x ∼ 3T the particle production<br />

will not be significantly suppressed. However, the solar example of<br />

Fig. 1.1 illustrates that <strong>for</strong> a sufficiently large coupling strength even<br />

a particle with a m<strong>as</strong>s of 30 T could have a significant impact. While<br />

it can be produced only by pl<strong>as</strong>ma constituents high up in the tails<br />

of the thermal distributions, the Boltzmann suppression factor e −mx/T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!