28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 Chapter 4<br />

The dispersion relation of neutrinos in a SN differs markedly from<br />

the vacuum <strong>for</strong>m; in the core the “effective m ν ” is several 10 keV. However,<br />

m ν in Eq. (4.91) is the vacuum m<strong>as</strong>s which couples left-handed<br />

to right-handed states and thus leads to spin flip while the mediuminduced<br />

“m<strong>as</strong>s” only affects the dispersion relation of left-handed states.<br />

This view is supported by a detailed study of Pantaleone (1991). Of<br />

course, <strong>for</strong> nonrelativistic neutrinos the situation is more complicated<br />

because an approximate identification of helicity with chirality is not<br />

possible.<br />

Next consider a specific process which involves a left- and a righthanded<br />

neutrino such <strong>as</strong> “spin-flip scattering” ν L (K L ) → ν R (K R ).<br />

Then, one needs to construct N µν from K 1 = (ω L , k L ) and K 2 =<br />

(m ν /2ω R ) 2 (ω R , −k R ). The contraction with S µν leads to (Raffelt and<br />

Seckel 1995)<br />

˜W (K L , K R ) = G2 Fn B<br />

4<br />

( mν<br />

2ω R<br />

) 2 [(1<br />

− cos θ)S1 + (3 + cos θ)S 2<br />

+ 4ω 2 R(1 − cos θ)S 3 − 4ω R (1 − cos θ)S 4 + 2(ω R − ω L )(1 + cos θ)S 5<br />

]<br />

.<br />

(4.92)<br />

Following Gaemers, Gandhi, and Lattimer (1989) it must be emph<strong>as</strong>ized<br />

that this expression differs in more than the factor (m ν /2ω R ) 2<br />

from the nonflip c<strong>as</strong>e Eq. (4.90). This difference is due to the changed<br />

angular momentum budget of reactions with spin-flipped neutrinos.<br />

This angular-momentum difference between spin-flip and no-flip<br />

processes is nicely illustrated by virtue of the pion decay process π ◦ →<br />

νν. If both final-state neutrinos are left-handed, i.e. if ν h<strong>as</strong> negative<br />

and ν positive helicity, this decay is <strong>for</strong>bidden by angular momentum<br />

conservation. This is seen most e<strong>as</strong>ily if one recalls that it is the<br />

pion current ∂ µ π ◦ that interacts with the left-handed neutrino current.<br />

The squared matrix element of the pion current is thus proportional<br />

to K µ π ◦Kν π◦. For a pion decaying at rest only the 00-component contributes.<br />

Contraction with N µν leads to identically zero if one recalls<br />

that <strong>for</strong> the final-state neutrinos ω 1 = ω 2 and k 1 = −k 2 . For the spinflip<br />

process one must use the reversed momentum instead so that in<br />

N µν one must use ω 1 = ω 2 and k 1 = k 2 , leading to a nonvanishing<br />

contribution. The decay of thermal pions is an important process <strong>for</strong><br />

populating the right-handed states of m<strong>as</strong>sive Dirac neutrinos in the<br />

early universe (Lam and Ng 1991). Contrary to a discussion by Natale<br />

(1991), however, pion decays do not seem to provide a particularly<br />

strong contribution in SN cores (Raffelt and Seckel 1991).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!