28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

314 Chapter 9<br />

Even coherent or partially coherent density matrices can be diagonalized<br />

in some b<strong>as</strong>is. The interactions with the background medium<br />

will also be diagonal in some b<strong>as</strong>is; <strong>for</strong> neutrinos, this is the weak interaction<br />

b<strong>as</strong>is. If the density matrix and the interactions are diagonal in<br />

the same b<strong>as</strong>is, there is no decoherence effect. For example, a density<br />

matrix diagonal in the weak interaction b<strong>as</strong>is implies that there is no<br />

relative ph<strong>as</strong>e in<strong>for</strong>mation between, say, a ν e and a ν µ and so collisions<br />

which affect ν e ’s and ν µ ’s separately have no impact on the density<br />

matrix. However, a density matrix which is diagonal in the m<strong>as</strong>s b<strong>as</strong>is,<br />

<strong>as</strong>sumed to be different from the weak interaction b<strong>as</strong>is, will suffer a<br />

loss of coherence in the same medium.<br />

All told, the loss of coherence is given by a shrinking of the length<br />

of P. More precisely, only the component P T is damped which represents<br />

the part “transverse” to the interaction b<strong>as</strong>is, i.e. which in the<br />

interaction b<strong>as</strong>is represents the off-diagonal elements of ρ. Thus, in the<br />

presence of collisions the evolution of P is given by (Stodolsky 1987)<br />

Ṗ = V × P − DP T . (9.1)<br />

The first part is the previous precession <strong>for</strong>mula, except that here a<br />

temporal evolution is appropriate since one h<strong>as</strong> in mind the evolution<br />

of a spatially homogeneous ensemble rather than the spatial pattern of<br />

a stationary beam. The “magnetic field” V is<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

V = 2π sin 2θ<br />

⎜ ⎟<br />

⎝ 0 ⎠ , (9.2)<br />

t osc<br />

cos 2θ<br />

where θ is the mixing angle in the medium and t osc the oscillation<br />

period. They are given in terms of the neutrino m<strong>as</strong>ses and momentum,<br />

the vacuum mixing angle, and the medium density by Eqs. (8.30)<br />

and (8.32) where strictly speaking the neutrino energy is to be replaced<br />

by its momentum <strong>as</strong> we have turned to temporal rather than spatial<br />

oscillations. The damping parameter D is determined by the scattering<br />

amplitudes on the background.<br />

The evolution described by Eq. (9.1) is a precession around the<br />

“magnetic field” V, combined with a shrinking of the length of P to<br />

zero. This final state corresponds to ρ = 1 where both flavors are<br />

2<br />

equally populated, and with vanishing coherence between them. For<br />

D = t −1<br />

osc and sin 2θ = 1 the evolution of the flavors is shown in Fig. 9.1<br />

2<br />

(solid line). Ignoring the wiggles in this curve it is an exponential <strong>as</strong><br />

can be seen by multiplying both sides of Eq. (9.1) with P/P 2 which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!