28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What Have We Learned from SN 1987A 507<br />

mostly with a time later than 0.5−1 s where the outer core h<strong>as</strong> settled<br />

and the shock h<strong>as</strong> begun to escape. The density of the protoneutron<br />

star falls within a thin shell from supranuclear levels to nearly<br />

zero, causing the “photosphere” radius r x of the new particles to be<br />

essentially the radius R ≈ 10 km of the settled compact star. With a<br />

“photosphere” temperature T x of the new objects their luminosity is<br />

4πr 2 σTx<br />

4 with the Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ which is gπ 2 /120 in<br />

natural units with g the effective number of degrees of freedom (2 <strong>for</strong><br />

photons). There<strong>for</strong>e, one must demand that<br />

T x ∼ < 8 MeV g −1/4 , (13.9)<br />

in order to stay below the total neutrino luminosity of 3×10 52 erg s −1 .<br />

It is nontrivial, however, to determine the temperature T x which<br />

corresponds to about unit optical depth. Following the approach of<br />

Turner (1988) who carried this analysis through <strong>for</strong> axions one may<br />

<strong>as</strong>sume a simple model <strong>for</strong> the run of temperature and density above<br />

the settled inner core. A simple power-law ansatz is ρ(r) = ρ R (R/r) n<br />

with the density ρ R = 10 14 g cm −3 at a radius R ≈ 10 km. A plausible<br />

ansatz <strong>for</strong> the temperature profile is T (r) = T R [ρ(r)/ρ R ] 1/3 with T R<br />

(temperature at radius R) of around 10 MeV. From the opacity κ <strong>as</strong> a<br />

function of density and temperature one may then calculate the optical<br />

depth <strong>as</strong> τ(r x ) = ∫ ∞<br />

r x<br />

κρ dr. From the condition τ(r x ) ≈ 2 one can<br />

3<br />

determine the “photosphere” radius r x and thus its temperature T x .<br />

The opacity of axions <strong>for</strong> a medium of nondegenerate nucleons w<strong>as</strong><br />

given in Eq. (4.28). One may define τ R ≡ κ R ρ R R so that κρR =<br />

τ R (ρ/ρ R ) 2 (T R /T ) 1/2 where Eq. (4.28) yields τ R = ga 2 3.4×10 16 . Then<br />

one finds <strong>for</strong> Turner’s model an optical depth τ a at the axion-sphere<br />

temperature T a<br />

τ a = τ R ( 11 6 n − 1) (T a/T R ) 11/2−3/n . (13.10)<br />

Because n is a relatively large number such <strong>as</strong> 3−7 the criterion τ a ∼ < 2<br />

3<br />

yields τ R ∼ > n (T R /T a ) 6 . With the requirement T a ∼ < 8 MeV and with<br />

T R ≈ 20 MeV <strong>as</strong> taken by Turner one finds g a ∼ > 2×10 −7 , not in bad<br />

agreement with what one would conclude from the numerical results<br />

shown in Fig. 13.1.<br />

Still, this argument is rather sensitive to the detailed model <strong>as</strong>sumptions<br />

concerning the protoneutron star structure. Also, <strong>as</strong> axions<br />

contribute to the transfer of energy within the star, a self-consistent<br />

model must take this effect into account. Moreover, <strong>for</strong> novel fermions<br />

such <strong>as</strong> r.h. neutrinos one must distinguish carefully between their neutrino<br />

sphere (from where they can escape almost freely) and the deeper

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!