28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 Chapter 2<br />

Y env > 0.22 is probably a conservative estimate. This takes us back<br />

to the conclusion that δM c ≈ 0 within at le<strong>as</strong>t 0.025 M ⊙ . Again, the<br />

core m<strong>as</strong>s at helium ignition is found to agree with the standard result<br />

to better than 5%.<br />

2.4.6 Systematic Uncertainties<br />

The globular-cluster argument yields some of the most restrictive limits<br />

on novel modes of energy loss. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is important to understand<br />

some of the systematic uncertainties that enter the nominal limit<br />

δM < c ∼ 0.025 M ⊙ .<br />

Core rotation h<strong>as</strong> often been quoted <strong>as</strong> an effect to change M c .<br />

However, <strong>as</strong> it would actually delay helium ignition it cannot be invoked<br />

to compensate <strong>for</strong> anomalous cooling effects. In addition, if f<strong>as</strong>t core<br />

rotation were an important effect one would expect it to vary from star<br />

to star, causing a random broadening of the distribution of ∆M tip<br />

HB,<br />

HB is<br />

an effect not indicated by the observations. The scatter of ∆M tip<br />

completely within observational errors and within the scatter caused<br />

by the effect that the brightest red giant is not exactly at the tip of the<br />

RGB in a given cluster. Further discussions of the rotational impact<br />

on M c are found in Catelan, de Freit<strong>as</strong> Pacheco, and Horvath (1995).<br />

The uncertainty of the conductive opacities are relatively large <strong>as</strong><br />

stressed by Catelan, de Freit<strong>as</strong> Pacheco, and Horvath (1995). However,<br />

conceivable modifications of M c do not seem to exceed the 0.010 M ⊙<br />

level even with extreme <strong>as</strong>sumptions.<br />

One of the main theoretical weaknesses of the helium-ignition argument<br />

is that the helium fl<strong>as</strong>h h<strong>as</strong> never been properly calculated.<br />

Because helium ignites off-center one expects that convection plays a<br />

major role in the process of heating the entire core and its expansion.<br />

One may worry that in the process of the fl<strong>as</strong>h, parts of the core are<br />

ejected into the stellar envelope, reducing its post-fl<strong>as</strong>h size. However,<br />

if significant amounts of helium were ejected, the inferred Y env would be<br />

changed dramatically. Even the ejection of 0.010 M ⊙ of helium would<br />

incre<strong>as</strong>e Y env by 0.03 if one <strong>as</strong>sumes an envelope m<strong>as</strong>s of 0.3 M ⊙ and<br />

thus would brighten RR Lyrae stars by 0.12 mag. Within the stated<br />

limit of δM c < 0.025 M ⊙ , m<strong>as</strong>s ejection from the core is a dramatic<br />

effect that would be hard to hide in the data.<br />

One significant systematic uncertainty arises from the relative abundance<br />

of metals among each other which is usually fixed by the solar<br />

mixture (Ross and Aller 1976). The <strong>as</strong>sumption of a Ross-Aller mixture<br />

<strong>for</strong> metal-poor systems like globular-cluster stars h<strong>as</strong> been called

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!