28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supernova Neutrinos 405<br />

Hayes, and Fryxell 1995). For the first time 2- and 3-dimensional calculations<br />

have become possible. They reveal a large-scale convective<br />

overturn (Fig. 11.5) which helps at revitalizing the shock because it<br />

brings hot material from depths near the neutrino sphere quickly up<br />

to the region immediately behind the shock, and cooler material down<br />

to the neutrino sphere where it absorbs energy from the neutrino flow.<br />

Successful explosions can be obtained <strong>for</strong> amounts of neutrino heating<br />

where 1-dimensional calculations did not succeed. The sharp transition<br />

between failed and successful explosions <strong>as</strong> a function of neutrino heating<br />

that w<strong>as</strong> found in 1-dimensional calculations (Fig. 11.4) is smoothed<br />

out, but neutrino heating still plays a pivotal role at obtaining a successful<br />

and sufficiently energetic explosion.<br />

In summary, then, the current standard picture of SN explosions is<br />

a modification and synthesis of the Colgate and Johnson (1960) shockdriven<br />

and the Colgate and White (1966) neutrino-driven explosions.<br />

At the present time there may still remain a quantitative problem at<br />

obtaining enough neutrino energy deposition behind the shock wave to<br />

guarantee a successful and sufficiently energetic explosion. It remains<br />

to be seen if this scenario withstands the test of time, or if a novel<br />

ingredient will have to be invoked in the future.<br />

11.1.4 Nucleosynthesis<br />

The universe began in a hot “big bang” which allowed <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

of nuclei from the protons and neutrons originally present in thermal<br />

equilibrium with the ambient heat bath. The primordial abundances<br />

“froze out” at about 22−24% helium, the rest hydrogen, and a small<br />

trace of other light elements such <strong>as</strong> lithium. The present-day distribution<br />

of elements w<strong>as</strong> bred from this primeval mix mostly by nuclear<br />

processes in stars; they eject some of their m<strong>as</strong>s at the end of their lives<br />

(Chapter 2), returning processed material to the interstellar medium<br />

from which new stars and planets are born.<br />

However, the normal stellar burning processes can produce elements<br />

only up to the iron group which have the largest binding energy per<br />

nucleon. Thus, the heavy elements must have been produced by different<br />

processes at different sites. It h<strong>as</strong> long been thought that nuclei<br />

with A > ∼ 70 were predominantly made by neutron capture, notably<br />

the s- and r- (slow and rapid) processes (Burbidge et al. 1957;<br />

Cameron 1957; Clayton 1968; Meyer 1994). The site <strong>for</strong> the occurrence<br />

of the r-process h<strong>as</strong> remained elusive <strong>for</strong> the p<strong>as</strong>t three decades,<br />

although many different suggestions have been made. The crux is that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!