28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

274 Chapter 7<br />

A related process to scattering by photon exchange is the spinprecession<br />

in a macroscopic magnetic or electric field into r.h. states of<br />

the same or another flavor, i.e. electromagnetic oscillation into “wronghelicity”<br />

states. Such effects will be studied in Sect. 8.4 in the general<br />

context of neutrino oscillations. In principle, this process can be important<br />

at modifying the me<strong>as</strong>urable l.h. solar neutrino flux <strong>as</strong> discussed<br />

in Sect. 10.7 in the context of the solar neutrino problem. Spin oscillations<br />

can also be important in supernovae where strong magnetic fields<br />

exist, although a detailed understanding remains elusive at the present<br />

time (Sect. 11.4).<br />

The most interesting process caused by dipole moments is the photon<br />

decay into neutrino pairs, γ → νν, which is enabled in media where<br />

the photon dispersion relation is such that ω 2 − k 2 > 0. It is the most<br />

interesting process because it occurs even in the absence of dipole moments<br />

due to a medium-induced neutrino-photon coupling (Chapter 6).<br />

This is the dominant standard neutrino emission process from stars <strong>for</strong><br />

a wide range of temperatures and densities. Details of both the standard<br />

and the dipole-induced “pl<strong>as</strong>ma process” depend on complicated<br />

fine points of the photon dispersion relation in media that were taken<br />

up in Chapter 6.<br />

The salient features, however, can be understood in an approximation<br />

where photons in a medium (“transverse pl<strong>as</strong>mons”) are treated <strong>as</strong><br />

particles with an effective m<strong>as</strong>s equal to the pl<strong>as</strong>ma frequency ω P which<br />

in a nonrelativistic medium is ω 2 P = 4παn e /m e with the electron density<br />

n e and electron m<strong>as</strong>s m e . The decay rate of these electromagnetic<br />

excitation in their own rest frame is then<br />

Γ γ = µ 2 ν<br />

ω 3 P<br />

24π<br />

with<br />

µ 2 ν = ∑ i,j<br />

(<br />

|µij | 2 + |ϵ ij | 2) , (7.26)<br />

while in the frame of the medium where the photon h<strong>as</strong> the energy ω a<br />

Lorentz factor ω P /ω must be included. The sum includes all final-state<br />

neutrino flavors with m i ≪ ω P ; otherwise ph<strong>as</strong>e-space modifications<br />

occur, and even a complete suppression of the decay by a neutrino<br />

m<strong>as</strong>s threshold. In contr<strong>as</strong>t with Eq. (7.25) relevant <strong>for</strong> the scattering<br />

rate, no destructive interference effects between magnetic and electric<br />

dipole amplitudes occur.<br />

Transition moments would allow <strong>for</strong> the radiative decay ν i → ν j γ.<br />

Again, because a neutrino charge radius or anapole moment vanish in<br />

the Q 2 → 0 limit relevant <strong>for</strong> free photons, radiative neutrino decays are<br />

most generally characterized by their magnetic and electric transition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!