28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nonstandard Neutrinos 267<br />

The quantity τ |U e3 | 2 is shown <strong>as</strong> a dotted line in Fig. 7.2. Even<br />

without nonstandard physics the decay rate is f<strong>as</strong>t on cosmological<br />

scales if m 3 ∼ > 2m e . Because experimentally m 3 may be <strong>as</strong> large <strong>as</strong><br />

24 MeV the cosmological m<strong>as</strong>s bound of 30 eV does not automatically<br />

apply. Experimental limits on U e3 together with the BBN m<strong>as</strong>s bound,<br />

however, exclude a heavy standard ν 3 . Even without reference to BBN<br />

it can be excluded on the b<strong>as</strong>is of the SN 1987A neutrino radiative<br />

lifetime limits (Sect. 12.5.2).<br />

7.3 Neutrino Electromagnetic Form Factors<br />

7.3.1 Overview<br />

When Wolfgang Pauli in 1930 first postulated the existence of neutrinos<br />

he speculated that they might interact like a magnetic dipole of a<br />

certain moment µ ν . If that were the c<strong>as</strong>e they could be me<strong>as</strong>ured by<br />

their ionizing power when they move through a medium; this ionizing<br />

power w<strong>as</strong> first calculated by Bethe (1935). Nahmi<strong>as</strong> (1935) me<strong>as</strong>ured<br />

the event rates in a Geiger-Müller counter in the presence and absence<br />

of a radioactive source and interpreted his null result <strong>as</strong> a limit<br />

µ < ν ∼ 2×10 −4 µ B (Bohr magneton µ B = e/2m e ) on the neutrino dipole<br />

moment. He concluded that “since this limit is already smaller than a<br />

nuclear magneton, it seems probable that the neutrino h<strong>as</strong> no moment<br />

at all.” Subsequent attempts to me<strong>as</strong>ure ever smaller neutrino dipole<br />

moments have consistently failed.<br />

The main difference between then and now is the advanced theoretical<br />

understanding of neutrino interactions in the context of the<br />

standard model of electroweak gauge interactions. A magnetic dipole<br />

interaction couples l.h. with r.h. states so that the latter would not<br />

be strictly sterile. This would be in conflict with the standard model<br />

where neutrinos interact only by their l.h. coupling to W and Z gauge<br />

bosons. Thus neutrino dipole moments must vanish identically because<br />

weak interactions violate parity maximally.<br />

This picture changes when neutrinos have m<strong>as</strong>ses because even the<br />

r.h. components of a Dirac neutrino are then not strictly sterile <strong>as</strong><br />

they couple to the Higgs field—or else they would not have a m<strong>as</strong>s.<br />

Indeed, an explicit calculation in the standard model with neutrino<br />

m<strong>as</strong>ses gave a magnetic dipole moment µ ν = 3.20×10 −19 µ B (m ν /eV)<br />

(Eq. 7.16). If neutrinos mix, they also obtain transition magnetic and<br />

electric moments. However, they are even smaller because of the GIM<br />

suppression effect—see Eq. (7.15).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!