28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Neutrino Oscillations 283<br />

As usual one expands the neutrino fields in plane waves of the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

Ψ(t, x) = Ψ k (t) e ik·x <strong>for</strong> which Eq. (8.1) is<br />

(∂ 2 t + k 2 + M 2 ) Ψ k (t) = 0 . (8.4)<br />

In general one cannot <strong>as</strong>sume a temporal variation e −iωt because there<br />

are three different branches of the dispersion relation with ωi 2 = k 2 +m 2 i .<br />

A mixed neutrino cannot simultaneously have a fixed momentum and<br />

a fixed energy!<br />

In practice one h<strong>as</strong> always to do with very relativistic neutrinos <strong>for</strong><br />

which k = |k| ≫ m i . In this limit one may linearize Eq. (8.4) by virtue<br />

of ∂t 2 + k 2 = (i∂ t + k)(−i∂ t + k). For each m<strong>as</strong>s eigenstate i∂ t → ω i ≈ k<br />

and one needs to keep the exact expression only in the second factor<br />

where the difference between energy and momentum appears. Thus<br />

∂t 2 + k 2 ≈ 2k(−i∂ t + k), leading to the Schrödinger-type equation<br />

(<br />

i∂ t Ψ k = Ω k Ψ k where Ω k ≡ k + M 2 )<br />

. (8.5)<br />

2k<br />

The vector Ψ originally consisted of neutrino Dirac spinors but it w<strong>as</strong><br />

reinterpreted <strong>as</strong> a vector of (positive-energy) probability amplitudes.<br />

For negative-energy states (antineutrinos) a global minus sign appears<br />

in Eq. (8.5).<br />

The Schrödinger equation (8.5) describes a spatially homogeneous<br />

system with a nonstationary temporal evolution. In practice one usually<br />

deals with the opposite situation, namely a stationary neutrino<br />

flux such <strong>as</strong> that from a reactor or the Sun with a nontrivial spatial<br />

variation. Then it is useful to expand Ψ(t, x) in components of fixed<br />

frequency Ψ ω (x)e −iωt , yielding<br />

(−ω 2 − ∇ 2 + M 2 ) Ψ ω (x) = 0. (8.6)<br />

In the relativistic limit and restricting the spatial variation to the<br />

z-direction one obtains in full analogy to the previous c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

i∂ z Ψ ω = −K ω Ψ ω where K ω ≡<br />

(<br />

ω − M 2<br />

2ω<br />

)<br />

. (8.7)<br />

This equation describes the spatial variation of a neutrino beam propagating<br />

in the positive z-direction with a fixed energy ω.<br />

Ultimately one is not interested in amplitudes but in the observable<br />

probabilities |Ψ l | 2 = Ψ ∗ lΨ l with l = e, µ, or τ. One may derive an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!