28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Two-Photon Coupling of Low-M<strong>as</strong>s Bosons 181<br />

By adjusting the g<strong>as</strong> pressure within the magnetic field volume one<br />

can make the photon and axion degenerate and thus enhance the transition<br />

rate (van Bibber et al. 1989). This applies, in particular, to<br />

solar axions which have keV energies so that the corresponding photon<br />

dispersion relation in low-Z g<strong>as</strong>es is “particle-like” with the pl<strong>as</strong>ma<br />

frequency being the effective m<strong>as</strong>s.<br />

If there is a gradient of the g<strong>as</strong> density, <strong>for</strong> example near a star, or<br />

if the g<strong>as</strong> density and magnetic field strength change in time <strong>as</strong> in the<br />

expanding universe, suitable conditions allow <strong>for</strong> resonant axion-photon<br />

conversions in the spirit of the neutrino MSW effect (Yoshimura 1988;<br />

Yanagida and Yoshimura 1988).<br />

For the magnetic conversion of pseudoscalars in the galactic magnetic<br />

field one must worry about density fluctuations of the interstellar<br />

medium which can be of order the medium density itself. In this c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

Eq. (5.29) is no longer valid because it w<strong>as</strong> b<strong>as</strong>ed on the <strong>as</strong>sumption of<br />

spatial homogeneity of all relevant quantities. Carlson and Garretson<br />

(1994) have derived an expression <strong>for</strong> the conversion rate in a medium<br />

with large random density variations. They found that it can be significantly<br />

suppressed relative to the naive result.<br />

5.4.2 Solar Axions<br />

An axion helioscope experiment w<strong>as</strong> per<strong>for</strong>med by Lazarus et al. (1992)<br />

who used a vacuum pipe of 6 ′′ diameter which w<strong>as</strong> placed in the bore of<br />

a dipole magnet of 72 ′′ length (1.80 m); the field strength w<strong>as</strong> 2.2 T. The<br />

helioscope w<strong>as</strong> oriented so that its long axis pointed along the azimuth<br />

of the setting Sun. This provided a time window of approximately<br />

15 min every day during which the line of sight through the vacuum<br />

region pointed directly to the Sun. As a detector they used an x-ray<br />

proportional chamber at the end of the pipe.<br />

Data were taken on several days with He at different pressures in<br />

the pipe. At 1 atm helium provides a pl<strong>as</strong>ma m<strong>as</strong>s of about 0.3 keV to<br />

x-rays. For vacuum, a 3σ bound of g aγ < 3.6×10 −9 GeV −1 <strong>for</strong> m a <<br />

0.050 eV w<strong>as</strong> found. For a helium pressure of 55 Torr the limit w<strong>as</strong><br />

3.9 in the same units, applicable to 0.050 < m a /eV < 0.086, and <strong>for</strong><br />

100 Torr it w<strong>as</strong> 3.4, applicable to 0.086 < m a /eV < 0.110. These<br />

bounds <strong>as</strong>sume an axion flux <strong>as</strong> given by Eq. (5.21) which in turn<br />

<strong>as</strong>sumes an unperturbed Sun. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, this <strong>as</strong>sumption is not<br />

consistent because the present-day age of the Sun already requires the<br />

bound Eq. (5.22).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!