28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

292 Chapter 8<br />

ing the detector. (Electrons from ν e interactions range out much f<strong>as</strong>ter<br />

in the rock and so one expects mostly muons from ν µ ’s.) This method is<br />

sensitive to the high-energy spectral regime of the atmospheric ν µ flux.<br />

Moreover, one may select upward going muons which are produced from<br />

ν µ ’s which traversed the entire Earth and thus have a large oscillation<br />

length available. The IMB detector excludes range c by this method<br />

(Becker-Szendy et al. 1992). Also, one may determine the fraction of<br />

muons stopped within the detector to those which exit, allowing one to<br />

constrain a spectral de<strong>for</strong>mation caused by the energy dependence of<br />

the oscillation length. Range d is excluded by this method according<br />

to the IMB detector (Becker-Szendy et al. 1992).<br />

However, several detectors see a substantial deficit of atmospheric<br />

ν µ ’s relative to ν e ’s, a finding usually expressed in terms of a “ratio of<br />

ratios,” i.e. the me<strong>as</strong>ured over the expected ratio of e-like over µ-like<br />

events (Fig. 8.7). While this procedure is justified because it is largely<br />

free of the uncertain absolute flux normalization, one must be careful<br />

at interpreting the significance of the flux deficit. The error of a me<strong>as</strong>ured<br />

ratio does not follow a Gaussian distribution; a representation<br />

like Fig. 8.7 tends to overemph<strong>as</strong>ize the significance of the discrepancy<br />

(Fogli and Lisi 1995).<br />

Fig. 8.7. Me<strong>as</strong>ured ratio of the atmospheric ν µ /ν e fluxes relative to the<br />

expected value (“ratio of ratios”) in five detectors. Where two results are<br />

shown they refer to different signatures or data samples. (See Goodman<br />

1995 <strong>for</strong> references.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!