28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Two-Photon Coupling of Low-M<strong>as</strong>s Bosons 191<br />

ing scale f a . This bound supersedes Sikivie’s (1988) previous scenario<br />

where he tried to explain the polarization features of certain sources<br />

by the conversion of cosmic-string-produced Nambu-Goldstone bosons<br />

to photons in cosmic magnetic fields. This scenario would have required<br />

C aγ ≈ 10 5 .<br />

5.5.5 Temperature Fluctuations in the Cosmic Microwave<br />

Background<br />

In the presence of large-scale magnetic fields in the universe, photons of<br />

the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) could convert into<br />

arions. The angular variations of the CMBR temperature have been<br />

me<strong>as</strong>ured by the COBE satellite and other instruments to be extremely<br />

small; a typical value is δT/T ≈ 10 −5 . There<strong>for</strong>e, the conversion process<br />

must not have been very efficient between the surface of l<strong>as</strong>t scattering<br />

and us.<br />

This argument h<strong>as</strong> been studied in detail by Chen (1995) <strong>for</strong> photongraviton<br />

conversion which is a very similar effect due to the two-photon<br />

coupling vertex which the m<strong>as</strong>sless gravitons must have. The coupling<br />

constant involves the inverse Planck m<strong>as</strong>s. There<strong>for</strong>e, one may also<br />

expect interesting effects <strong>for</strong> hypothetical arions which could couple to<br />

photons more strongly than gravitons do.<br />

5.6 Summary of Constraints on g aγ<br />

The <strong>as</strong>trophysical and experimental bounds on the photon coupling<br />

of arbitrary pseudoscalars are summarized in Fig. 5.9. “Haloscope”<br />

refers to the search <strong>for</strong> galactic axions discussed in Sect. 5.3 and so<br />

these constraints (Fig. 5.7) apply only if the pseudoscalars are the dark<br />

matter in our galaxy. The dotted line is the search regime <strong>for</strong> the<br />

ongoing experiment mentioned in Sect. 5.3.<br />

“Helioscope” refers to the search <strong>for</strong> solar axion to x-ray conversion<br />

(Sect. 5.4.2). It is shown <strong>as</strong> a d<strong>as</strong>hed line because it is not self-consistent<br />

in that it <strong>as</strong>sumes an unperturbed Sun—the area enclosed by the d<strong>as</strong>hed<br />

line is already excluded by the solar age.<br />

“Telescope” refers to the search <strong>for</strong> decay photons from the cosmic<br />

axion background (Sect. 12.7.2, Fig. 12.23). It is <strong>as</strong>sumed that the<br />

pseudoscalars were in thermal equilibrium in the early universe.<br />

“L<strong>as</strong>er” refers to the birefringence and shining-light-through-walls<br />

experiments discussed above. The most restrictive such limit is from<br />

the rotation of the plane of polarization of a l<strong>as</strong>er beam trapped in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!