28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

494 Chapter 13<br />

were observed, constraining various mechanisms that could have removed<br />

neutrinos from the beam such <strong>as</strong> decays. Equally important, the<br />

nonobservation of a γ-ray burst in coincidence with the neutrino burst<br />

constrains radiative decays of neutrinos and other particles (Sect. 12.4).<br />

More intricate arguments involve signal dispersion, either between<br />

photons and neutrinos, between ν e ’s and ν e ’s, or the intrinsic dispersion<br />

of the ν e burst, constraining various effects that could cause signal<br />

dispersion such <strong>as</strong> a nonzero neutrino m<strong>as</strong>s or charge.<br />

Most importantly, the inferred cooling time scale of a few seconds<br />

of the newborn neutron star precludes an efficient operation of a nonstandard<br />

cooling agent and thus yields constraints on the emission of<br />

new particles from the SN core, notably of right-handed (r.h.) neutrinos<br />

or axions. This line of re<strong>as</strong>oning is analogous to the “energy-loss<br />

argument” which <strong>for</strong> normal stars h<strong>as</strong> been advanced in Chapter 2.<br />

13.2 B<strong>as</strong>ic Characteristics of the Neutrino Burst<br />

13.2.1 Fluence<br />

The neutrinos from a SN are expected to consist of two major components:<br />

the prompt ν e burst, and qu<strong>as</strong>i-thermal emission of about equal<br />

total amounts of energy in (anti)neutrinos of all flavors. The water<br />

Cherenkov detectors would register the ν e burst by virtue of the reaction<br />

ν e + e − → e − + ν e where the scattered electron is strongly <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

peaked, while the cooling signal is registered by ν e + p → n + e + with<br />

an essentially isotropic e + signal. Even though both detectors observed<br />

a <strong>for</strong>ward peaked overall signal, it cannot be <strong>as</strong>sociated with ν e -e collisions<br />

(Sect. 11.3.5). Most or all of the events are interpreted <strong>as</strong> ν e ’s.<br />

The observation of a ν e fluence (time-integrated flux) roughly in<br />

agreement with what is expected from a stellar collapse precludes that<br />

these particles have decayed on their way from the SN to us, yielding<br />

a constraint on their lifetime of (Frieman, Haber, and Freese 1988)<br />

τ νe /m νe ∼ > 6×10 5 s/eV. (13.1)<br />

However, this simple result must be interpreted with care because m<strong>as</strong>sive<br />

neutrinos are expected to mix. The heavy ν e admixtures could<br />

decay and may violate this bound.<br />

The ν e ’s were not removed by excessive scattering on cosmic background<br />

neutrinos, majorons, dark-matter particles etc., leading to constraints<br />

on “secret interactions” (Kolb and Turner 1987). Take the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!