28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Two-Photon Coupling of Low-M<strong>as</strong>s Bosons 185<br />

a more restrictive limit of g aγ < 3.6×10 −7 GeV −1 <strong>for</strong> m < a ∼ 7×10 −4 eV.<br />

For a larger m<strong>as</strong>s an a-γ oscillation pattern develops on the length scale<br />

of the optical cavity, leading to an “oscillating limit” <strong>as</strong> a function of<br />

m a . In this regime the ellipticity me<strong>as</strong>urement w<strong>as</strong> superior.<br />

New experimental ef<strong>for</strong>ts in the birefringence category include a<br />

proposal by Cooper and Stedman (1995) to use ring l<strong>as</strong>ers. A l<strong>as</strong>er<br />

experiment which is actually in the process of being built is PVLAS<br />

(Bakalov et al. 1994) which will be able to improve previous laboratory<br />

limits on g aγ by a factor of 40, i.e. it is expected to be sensitive in<br />

the regime g > aγ ∼ 1×10 −8 GeV −1 <strong>as</strong> long <strong>as</strong> m < a ∼ 10 −3 eV. While such<br />

strong couplings are <strong>as</strong>trophysically excluded it is intriguing that this<br />

experiment should be able to detect <strong>for</strong> the first time the standard QED<br />

birefringence effect of Fig. 5.8a.<br />

5.5 Astrophysical Magnetic Fields<br />

5.5.1 Transitions in Magnetic Fields of <strong>Stars</strong><br />

Certain stars have very strong magnetic fields. For example, neutron<br />

stars frequently have fields of 10 12 −10 13 G (e.g. Mészáros 1992), and<br />

even white dwarfs can have fields of up to 10 9 G. There<strong>for</strong>e, one may<br />

think that axions produced in the hot interior of neutron stars at a temperature<br />

of, say, 50 keV would convert to γ-rays in the magnetosphere<br />

(Morris 1986). However, the vacuum refractive term suppresses the<br />

conversion rate because the photon momentum <strong>for</strong> a given frequency<br />

is k γ = n ∥,⊥ ω > ω with the refractive indices Eq. (5.31) while <strong>for</strong> the<br />

axions k a = ω − m 2 a/2ω < ω. There<strong>for</strong>e, in the presence of a magnetic<br />

field axions and photons are less degenerate so that it is more difficult<br />

<strong>for</strong> them to oscillate into each other.<br />

In principle, the refractive index can be cancelled by the presence<br />

of a pl<strong>as</strong>ma where the photon <strong>for</strong>ward scattering on electrons induces a<br />

negative n−1, i.e. something like a photon effective m<strong>as</strong>s. In the aligned<br />

rotator model <strong>for</strong> a magnetized neutron star a self-consistent solution of<br />

the Maxwell equations with currents requires the presence of an electron<br />

density of about n e = 7×10 10 cm −3 B 12 Ps<br />

−1 where B 12 is the magnetic<br />

field along the rotation axis in units of 10 12 G and P s is the pulsar period<br />

in seconds (Goldreich and Julian 1969). The corresponding pl<strong>as</strong>ma<br />

frequency is ωP 2 = 4παn e /m e = 0.97×10 −10 eV 2 B 12 Ps<br />

−1 . This implies<br />

k − ω = −ωP/2ω 2 = −5×10 −14 eV B 12 Ps<br />

−1 ωkeV −1 with ω keV = ω/keV, to<br />

be compared with ∆ ∥ = (n ∥ − 1) ω = 0.92×10 −4 eV B12ω 2 keV which is<br />

much larger, allowing one to ignore the pl<strong>as</strong>ma term.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!