28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 Chapter 3<br />

(Pontecorvo 1959; Gandel’man and Pinaev 1959) or by photoproduction<br />

γe − → e − νν (Ritus 1961; Chiu and Stabler 1961). The set of<br />

processes important <strong>for</strong> normal stars w<strong>as</strong> completed by Adams, Ruderman,<br />

and Woo (1963) who discovered the pl<strong>as</strong>ma process γ → νν.<br />

Neutrino emission by these reactions is now a standard <strong>as</strong>pect of stellarevolution<br />

theory.<br />

If other weakly interacting particles were to exist which couple directly<br />

to electrons they could essentially play the same role and thus<br />

add to the energy loss of stars. The main speculation to be followed<br />

up in this chapter is the possible existence of weakly interacting bosons<br />

that would couple to electrons. Among standard particles the only lowm<strong>as</strong>s<br />

bosons are photons and probably gravitons. The <strong>for</strong>mer dominate<br />

the radiative energy transfer in stars, the latter are so weakly interacting<br />

that their thermal emission is negligible (Sect. 3.7). Why worry<br />

about others<br />

Such a motivation arises from several sources. Low-m<strong>as</strong>s bosons<br />

could mediate long-range <strong>for</strong>ces between electrically neutral bodies <strong>for</strong><br />

which gravity is the only standard interaction. It is an interesting<br />

end in itself to set the best possible bounds on possible other <strong>for</strong>ces<br />

which might arise from the exchange of novel scalar or vector bosons.<br />

Their existence seemed indicated <strong>for</strong> some time in the context of the<br />

“fifth-<strong>for</strong>ce” episode alluded to in Sect. 3.6.3 below. It is also possible<br />

that baryon or lepton number play the role of physical charges similar<br />

to the electric charge, and that a new gauge interaction is <strong>as</strong>sociated<br />

with them. The baryonic or leptonic photons arising from this hypothesis<br />

are intriguing candidates <strong>for</strong> weakly interacting low-m<strong>as</strong>s bosons<br />

(Sect. 3.6.4). It will turn out, however, that typically m<strong>as</strong>sless bosons<br />

which mediate long-range <strong>for</strong>ces are best constrained by experiments<br />

which test the equivalence principle of general relativity. Put another<br />

way, to a high degree of accuracy gravity is found to be the only longrange<br />

interaction between neutral bodies.<br />

Long-range leptonic <strong>for</strong>ces can be screened by the cosmic neutrino<br />

background. In this c<strong>as</strong>e the stellar energy-loss argument remains of<br />

importance to limit their possible strength (Sect. 3.6.4).<br />

The remaining category of interesting new bosons are those which<br />

couple to the spin of fermions and thus do not mediate a long-range<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce between unpolarized bodies. In the simplest c<strong>as</strong>e their CP-conserving<br />

coupling would be of a pseudoscalar nature. Such particles arise<br />

naturally <strong>as</strong> Nambu-Goldstone bosons in scenarios where a global chiral<br />

U(1) symmetry is spontaneously broken at some large energy scale. The<br />

most widely discussed example is the Peccei-Quinn symmetry that w<strong>as</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!