28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 Chapter 3<br />

however, it is important even in environments which are approximately<br />

nondegenerate and so I begin with this simple c<strong>as</strong>e.<br />

The calculation amounts to a straight<strong>for</strong>ward evaluation of the matrix<br />

element corresponding to the amplitude of Fig. 3.5 and an integration<br />

over the Maxwell-Boltzmann distributions of the electrons. In<br />

order to account <strong>for</strong> screening effects the Coulomb propagator is modified<br />

according to Eq. (6.72), |q| −4 → [q 2 (q 2 + kS)] 2 −1 where k S is a<br />

screening wave number (Sect. 6.4). For the emission of pseudoscalars<br />

one then finds <strong>for</strong> the energy-loss rate per unit volume to lowest order<br />

in kS 2 (Krauss, Moody, and Wilczek 1984; Raffelt 1986a)<br />

Q = 128<br />

45 √ π<br />

× ∑ j<br />

α 2 α ′<br />

m e<br />

( T<br />

m e<br />

) 5/2<br />

n e<br />

(<br />

√<br />

n j<br />

[Zj<br />

2 2 1 − 5 8<br />

kS<br />

2 ) (<br />

+ Z j 1 − 5 m e T<br />

4<br />

kS<br />

2 )]<br />

. (3.28)<br />

m e T<br />

Here, the sum is extended over all nuclear species with charges Z j e and<br />

number densities n j ; note that n e = ∑ j Z j n j . The term quadratic in Z j<br />

corresponds to electron-nucleus collisions while the linear term is from<br />

electron-electron scattering which yields a nonnegligible contribution<br />

under nondegenerate conditions. 19<br />

Raffelt (1986a) incorrectly used Eq. (6.61) <strong>as</strong> a modification of the<br />

Coulomb propagator, a procedure which enhances the terms proportional<br />

to kS 2 by a factor of 2. Either way, screening is never an important<br />

effect. The screening scale is kS 2 = kD 2 + ki<br />

2 because both electrons<br />

and nuclei (ions) contribute. Then<br />

kS<br />

2<br />

m e T = 4πα (n<br />

m e T 2 e + ∑ j<br />

n j Z 2 j<br />

)<br />

, (3.29)<br />

which is about 0.12 at the center of the Sun and 0.17 in the cores of<br />

horizontal-branch (HB) stars.<br />

Ignoring screening effects, the energy-loss rate per unit m<strong>as</strong>s is<br />

ϵ = α ′ 5.9×10 22 erg g −1 s −1 T 2.5<br />

8 Y e ρ ∑ j<br />

Y j<br />

(<br />

Z<br />

2<br />

j + Z j / √ 2 ) , (3.30)<br />

where T 8 = T/10 8 K, ρ is in g cm −3 , and Y j = X j /A j is the number<br />

fraction of nuclear species j relative to baryons while X j is the m<strong>as</strong>s<br />

fraction, A j the m<strong>as</strong>s number.<br />

19 Note that e − e − → e − e − γ vanishes to lowest order because two particles of<br />

equal m<strong>as</strong>s moving under the influence of their Coulomb interaction do not produce<br />

a time-varying electric dipole moment because their center of m<strong>as</strong>s and “center of<br />

charge” coincide. However, the emission of pseudoscalars corresponds to M1 rather<br />

than E1 transitions and so it is not suppressed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!