28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

110 Chapter 3<br />

The requirement L < a ∼ L ⊙ yields a constraint α < a ∼ 1.7×10 −22 .<br />

A much more restrictive limit arises from the white-dwarf luminosity<br />

function <strong>as</strong> axion emission would accelerate white-dwarf cooling.<br />

This argument w<strong>as</strong> studied in detail in Sect. 2.2.4 <strong>as</strong> a generic c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

<strong>for</strong> the use of the white-dwarf luminosity function; the resulting constraint<br />

is given in Tab. 3.1. The cooling speed of white dwarfs w<strong>as</strong><br />

also established from a me<strong>as</strong>urement of the period decre<strong>as</strong>e of the DA<br />

variable (ZZ Ceti) star G117–B15A which thus yields a similar limit.<br />

However, the period decre<strong>as</strong>e of this star may be slightly f<strong>as</strong>ter than<br />

can be attributed to standard cooling processes; it h<strong>as</strong> been speculated<br />

that axions with a coupling strength of about α a ≈ 0.5×10 −26 could be<br />

responsible (Sect. 2.2.5). The limit Eq. (3.44) that w<strong>as</strong> derived in the<br />

previous section from the helium-ignition argument in globular clusters<br />

is of a similar magnitude, but not restrictive enough to exclude this<br />

hypothesis.<br />

All of these constraints apply to low-m<strong>as</strong>s bosons. The most restrictive<br />

one is b<strong>as</strong>ed on the helium ignition argument with T ≈ 10 8 K =<br />

8.6 keV. There<strong>for</strong>e, these constraints apply if m < ∼ 10 keV. However,<br />

it would be incorrect to think that <strong>for</strong> larger m<strong>as</strong>ses there w<strong>as</strong> no constraint.<br />

There is one, but it is degraded because threshold effects limit<br />

the particle production to the high-energy tails of the thermal distributions<br />

of the pl<strong>as</strong>ma constituents. For m<strong>as</strong>sive pseudoscalars, this<br />

question h<strong>as</strong> been studied in Sect. 1.3.5 in the context of general solar<br />

particle constraints. For the more restrictive globular-cluster limits,<br />

such a detailed investigation does not exist in the literature.<br />

3.6.2 Energy Loss by Scalar and Vector Bosons<br />

The couplings of low-m<strong>as</strong>s scalar or vector particles ϕ are e<strong>as</strong>y to constrain<br />

by the same methods. Because the energy-loss rates have been<br />

calculated only <strong>for</strong> nondegenerate conditions, only the arguments involving<br />

the solar age and the helium-burning lifetime can be employed.<br />

The latter yields a constraint on the ϕ-e coupling of<br />

α ϕe ∼ < 1.4×10 −29 . (3.46)<br />

It is b<strong>as</strong>ed on the bremsstrahlung process e + 4 He → 4 He + e + ϕ <strong>as</strong><br />

discussed above in Sect. 3.5.5. For vector bosons which couple by a<br />

current-current structure analogous to photons the same results apply<br />

except <strong>for</strong> a factor of two in the emission rate which improves the limit<br />

by a factor of 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!