28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118 Chapter 4<br />

From the perspective of particle physics, however, a more interesting<br />

nuclear environment is a young neutron star <strong>for</strong> the first few seconds<br />

after the progenitor collapsed. The nuclear medium here is so hot that<br />

it is essentially nondegenerate, and neutrinos are trapped. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

the production of even more weakly interacting particles such <strong>as</strong> axions<br />

or right-handed neutrinos can compete with neutrino energy transfer<br />

which is essentially a diffusion process. For a quantitative understanding<br />

of the emissivities of the new particles, but also <strong>for</strong> the conventional<br />

transport of energy and lepton number by neutrinos, a knowledge of<br />

the microscopic interaction rates is needed.<br />

The neutrino opacities that went into standard SN collapse and explosion<br />

calculations <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the particle emissivities that went into<br />

the derivation of, say, axion bounds from SN 1987A were b<strong>as</strong>ed on the<br />

<strong>as</strong>sumption that the hot nuclear medium can be treated <strong>as</strong> an ideal<br />

Boltzmann g<strong>as</strong> of free particles, except <strong>for</strong> degeneracy effects that are<br />

e<strong>as</strong>y to include. It turns out, however, that the approximations made<br />

are internally inconsistent, notably <strong>for</strong> the dominant processes which<br />

involve couplings to the nucleon spin (axial-vector current interactions).<br />

In order <strong>for</strong> the “naive” neutral-current neutrino opacities to be correct<br />

one needs to <strong>as</strong>sume that the nucleon spins do not fluctuate too f<strong>as</strong>t on<br />

a time scale set by the temperature. A naive perturbative calculation,<br />

however, yields a spin-fluctuation rate which is much larger than this<br />

limit. This large rate went into the axion emissivities. There<strong>for</strong>e, the<br />

existing studies of SN axion bounds are b<strong>as</strong>ed on microscopic interaction<br />

rates which simultaneously make use of the opposite limits of a<br />

spin-fluctuation rate very small and very large compared with T .<br />

Beyond the ideal-g<strong>as</strong> approximation there is virtually no literature<br />

on the microscopic interaction rates in a hot nuclear medium, presumably<br />

because of the historical focus on old neutron stars, and presumably<br />

because degenerate nuclear matter is more reminiscent of actual<br />

nuclei. Thus there is a dearth of reliable microscopic input physics <strong>for</strong><br />

conventional studies of SN evolution, and <strong>for</strong> variations involving novel<br />

particle-physics ide<strong>as</strong>.<br />

Most of this chapter focusses on the dominant axial-vector current<br />

interactions of neutrinos and axions with nucleons in a dense and hot<br />

medium. Most of the material is b<strong>as</strong>ed on a series of papers which<br />

I have co-authored (Raffelt and Seckel 1991, 1995; Keil, Janka, and<br />

Raffelt 1995; Keil et al. 1995) and <strong>as</strong> such does not represent a community<br />

consensus. On the other hand, I am not aware of a significant<br />

controversy. Rather, it appears that very little serious interest h<strong>as</strong><br />

been taken in the difficult question of weakly interacting particles in-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!