28.01.2015 Views

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

112 Chapter 3<br />

One may also consider the Yukawa coupling of scalar (vector) bosons<br />

to baryons (Grifols and M<strong>as</strong>só 1986; Grifols, M<strong>as</strong>só, and Peris 1989b).<br />

In this c<strong>as</strong>e one may use the Compton process γ + 4 He → 4 He + ϕ on<br />

a helium nucleus <strong>for</strong> which the emission rate is given mutatis mutandis<br />

by the same <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>as</strong> <strong>for</strong> nonrelativistic electrons. Assuming the<br />

same coupling to protons and neutrons the emission rate is coherently<br />

enhanced by a factor 4 2 . Moreover, in Eq. (3.22) one must replace<br />

Y e with Y He (number of 4 He nuclei per baryon) which is 1 <strong>for</strong> pure<br />

4<br />

helium, m e is to be replaced by m He ≈ 4m u , and α → 4α to account<br />

<strong>for</strong> the coherent photon coupling. Pulling these factors together one<br />

finds ϵ = α ϕN 0.7×10 23 erg g −1 s −1 <strong>for</strong> pure helium. Because the heliumburning<br />

lifetime argument limits this energy-loss rate to 10 erg g −1 s −1<br />

one finds<br />

α ϕN ∼ < 1.5×10 −22 (3.47)<br />

<strong>as</strong> a limit on the coupling of a scalar boson to a nucleon N. Again, <strong>for</strong><br />

vector bosons this limit is a factor of 2 more restrictive.<br />

3.6.3 Long-Range Forces<br />

Scalar or vector particles mediate long-range <strong>for</strong>ces between macroscopic<br />

bodies. For pseudoscalars this is not the c<strong>as</strong>e because their CPconserving<br />

coupling to fermions h<strong>as</strong> a pseudoscalar structure, i.e. in the<br />

nonrelativistic limit they couple to the fermion spin. There<strong>for</strong>e, even<br />

if the m<strong>as</strong>s of the new particles is very small or exactly zero, they do<br />

not mediate a long-range <strong>for</strong>ce between unpolarized bodies. The residual<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce caused by the simultaneous exchange of two pseudoscalars is<br />

found to be extremely small (e.g. Grifols and Tortosa 1994).<br />

Consider a scalar of m<strong>as</strong>s m = λ −1 (Compton wave length λ) which<br />

couples to nucleons with a Yukawa strength g. It mediates an attractive<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce between two nucleons given in terms of the potential<br />

−(g 2 /4π) r −1 e −r/λ . Two macroscopic test bodies of geometric dimension<br />

much below λ are then attracted by virtue of the total potential<br />

m 1 m 2<br />

V (r) = −G N (1 + βe −r/λ ), (3.48)<br />

r<br />

where G N = m −2<br />

Pl is Newton’s constant, m Pl = 1.22×10 19 GeV is the<br />

Planck m<strong>as</strong>s, m 1 and m 2 are the m<strong>as</strong>ses of the bodies, and<br />

β ≡ g2 m 2 Pl<br />

. (3.49)<br />

4π u 1 u 2<br />

Here, u 1,2 = m 1,2 /N 1,2 with N 1,2 the total number of nucleons in each<br />

body. Apart from small binding-energy effects which are different <strong>for</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!